Skip to main content

Fact-checking a concert review

I was fortunate enough to see my favorite band, Muse, at the LCA (Little Caesars Arena) in Detroit last Thursday. The only review I read of the show was by Gary Graff of The Oakland Press, and while it was quite positive in tone, there were several factual inaccuracies which I felt the need to correct.

The first error comes in the second real paragraph of the piece, where Graff ends by saying, "The troupe returned to the main stage for 'Pressure,' executing marching band choreography while Muse pounded through the track -- one of eight played from last year's 'Simulation Theory' album."

Seven tracks were played from the album: 1) "Algorithm," 2) "The Dark Side," 3) "Pressure," 4) "Propaganda," 5) "Break It to Me," 6) "Thought Contagion," and 7) "Dig Down." While a short snippet of an alternative version of "Algorithm" was played at the outset, I hardly think that constitutes as a full song, especially considering the track was only available on extended versions of the LP.

Later in the review, Graff then writes, "The sensory overload only bolstered the music, however. With rare exceptions -- like 'Dig Down' and the vibey 'Madness' that followed -- Muse kept the pedal floored as it tore through both 'Simulation Theory' songs and older material with a near-metallic energy."

While "Dig Down" did appear on Simulation Theory, "Madness" made its presence on the band's 2012 album, The 2nd Law, a full 6 years prior to their most recent release.

To end the piece, Graff writes, "As 'Knights of Cydonia' crashed to an end, Muse could declare itself 'victorious' once again -- and leave the Little Caesars faithful wondering just what the group is going to come up with to top itself next time."

The writer implies that "victorious" is one of the main lyrics in the song "Knights of Cydonia," but it's actually featured in "Uprising," where the chorus goes, "They will not force us. They will stop degrading us. They will not control us. We will be victorious."

Great show; so-so review from a guy who described an alien as a "giant robot puppet."

https://www.theoaklandpress.com/entertainment/muse-makes-simulation-very-real-at-little-caesars-arena/article_40725f18-5798-11e9-9018-6f475e555dd1.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"