Skip to main content

Mark Cuban's imperfect comparison

Dallas Mavericks owner had some interesting words with regard to the Donald Sterling controversy, which many right-wing sites have picked up on as "rationale thoughts."

Cuban called the potential matter "a very very very slippery slope," elaborating on the matter with this:

"If it's about racism and we're ready to kick people out of the league, OK? Then what about homophobia?... What about somebody who's anti-semitic? What about a xenophobe?... In this country, people are allowed to be morons."

While I can see where Mr. Cuban is coming from, I think his comparison is a matter of apples and oranges. In any one of those other scenarios (homophobia, anti-semitic, xenophobia), there would be some anger, most likely a fine, possibly a short suspension, but it would not bring about the same level of emotion as it would (and did) with regard to racism against blacks. The reason is quite simple. According to a 2013 report, blacks make up 76.3% of all NBA players, 43.3% of all NBA head coaches, and 35.7% of all NBA professional staff positions. While the percentage of African-Americans as head coaches and in professional staff positions is significantly higher in the NBA than in other pro sports, the most significant number is that 76.3. Over three-quarters of NBA players are black. When Donald Sterling made his racist comments against blacks, he insulted 3/4 of NBA players, including a large majority of players on his very own team. So, while I can understand where Mr. Cuban is coming from, like I said, it's a matter of apples and oranges. Many in the league may get angry if an owner made derogatory statements against homosexuals or people of a certain faith, but it would not cause the kind of uproar it did when Donald Sterling insulted over 75% of NBA players. That'd be like a head of a Mormon church insulting whites (according to a 2008 study, approximately 91% of Mormons are white)...

http://thinkprogress.org/sports/2014/04/28/3431928/mark-cuban-says-kicking-clippers-owner-out-of-nba-for-racist-comments-is-a-very-very-very-slippery-slope/

http://www.tidesport.org/RGRC/2013/2013_NBA_RGRC.pdf

http://commons.trincoll.edu/aris/2011/12/14/mormon-study-shows-regional-concentration-and-growing-republicanism/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...