Skip to main content

Pastor Kevin Swanson apparently likes talking crazy

With regard to a new Nabisco Honey Maid commercial, which showcases a same-sex couple, anti-LGBT rights Pastor Kevin Swanson of Colorado was at it again, as he made the following statements in a Generations Radio broadcast:

- "When you come down to things like axe murder or homosexuality and you say, 'We're really going to promote it and we're going to encourage everybody in America to engage in this or at least support this thing,' there will be people on the other side who will take an adamantly opposed position to your support of axe murdering or homosexuality. They will be intolerant -- they will be very intolerant of that which is evil, like axe murdering."

- "Maybe they had another family where a dog is the wife with a human husband. Homosexuals love their friends and cannibals love their victims - they taste good."

These quotes are so out of whack, I seriously have to wonder if Mr. Swanson was high or drunk at the time of uttering them.

With regard to the first quote, the first thing that came to mind was a '90s Mike Myers film, entitled, So I Married an Axe Murderer. If the two "evils" were so comparable, then the screenwriters could have named the film, So I Married a Homosexual, and it would have been virtually identical, right?

Also, I remember seeing the following question and answers on a make-believe episode of Family Feud:

Question: "What's the scariest thing in the world?"

5. Gunshots

4. Tornadoes/hurricanes

3. Axe murderers

2. Death

1. Homosexuals


Then, with regard to Mr. Swanson's second quote, he compares homosexuals "loving" their friends to cannibals loving their victims, because they taste good. Okay... If he's going to make that comparison, couldn't he also say, "Heterosexuals love their "friends" (partners) and cannibals love their victims - they taste good"? In other words, the comparison doesn't make a "lick" of sense. Yeah, like I said earlier, I really wonder if before this show's broadcast, Swanson mumbled to himself, "Mm... I love the taste of my friends Johnny Walker, Jose Cuervo, and Mary Jane."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/14/nabisco-gay-ad-kevin-swanson-_n_5148572.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...