Skip to main content

Missouri State Representative compares abortion to buying a car

Missouri State Representative Chuck Gatschenberger (yes, a Republican) recently defended his controversial bill, which would force women to have ultrasounds before undergoing abortions, by saying this at a hearing this past Tuesday:

"In making a decision to buy a car, I put research in there to find out what to do."

Yes, the Missouri lawmaker compared pregnancy and abortion to buying a car.

Fellow State Representative Stacey Newman (Democrat) responded to Gatschenberger's awful analogy by saying it was "extremely offensive to every single woman sitting in here," before adding the following:

"Do you believe that buying a car is in any way related to a pregnancy decision? That kind of attitude is demeaning to women, regardless of what they decide to do."

After hearing the backlash from Newman and many other women, Gatschenberger apologized for his analogy, and added, "I'm just saying this is a life-ending decision. You should think about it."

I'm not sure which was more pathetic, Gatschenberger's initial comment or his apology. Does he remember what his initial comment was? Allow me to refresh his memory...

"In making a decision to buy a car, I put research in there to find out what to do."

...and how did he follow up again?

"I'm just saying this is a life-ending decision. You should think about it."

In other words, Representative Gatschenberger either believes that buying a car is a life-ending decision or he is admitting that his analogy was about as spot on as a drunken blind man at a urinal.

On that note, allow me to share with you a few future Gatschenberger analogies and his likely apologies:

Gatschenberger analogy: "Look, when I tune into The Weather Channel, I know people are going to die. It's just like gay marriage."

Gatschenberger apology: "I'm just saying it's sinful. Think about it."


Gatschenberger analogy: "When I think of healthcare reform, I think of Hitler. They both start with 'h's,' right?"

Gatschenberger apology: "I'm just saying it's dangerous. That's all. Nothing more and nothing less."


Gatschenberger analogy: "Women who use birth control are like beaten-up boxers.

Gatschenberger apology: "I'm just saying they get pounded a lot. What's so offensive about that?"


Yeah, it looks like Chuck Gatschenberger didn't receive the GOP's memo on how to talk to and about women...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/09/abortion-buying-car-chuck-gatschenberger_n_5119730.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"