Skip to main content

A**hole of the Year - Joe the Plumber (and it's not even June)

Starting next year, next to the words "insensitive," "jerk," "prick," and "douche" in the dictionary will be a picture of Samuel Wurzelbacher, or as he's better known, Joe the Plumber.

Following the recent Santa Barbara shooting rampage, Wurzelbacher wrote an open letter to the victims' families, where he actually said this:

"I am sorry you lost your child. I myself have a son and daughter and the one thing I never want to go through, is what you are going through right now. But: As harsh as this sounds -- your dead kids don't trump my Constitutional rights."

He then claimed that pro-gun control activists "don't care about your family or your dead children at all," before following that up with this:

"They sound like they do, whereas I sound uncaring and like I say, harsh. Don't be fooled - I care about your family and mine. The future of our very liberty lies in the balance of this fight."

Joe the Plumber is half right regarding that final quote. He does sound uncaring, but I wouldn't label his statement "harsh." While he sounds uncaring, he also sounds like an idiot, and the epitome of a first-class jerk.

Wurzelbacher doesn't care about these victims' families or the thousands of other families whom are affected by gun violence. He just cares about his delusion of having total freedom with regard to firearms and his paranoia about the government controlling his every thought and action. He claims the "future of our liberty lies in the balance of this fight" - the fight to ensure "complete" freedom with regard to guns. Yet the combination of an insane individual and a gun will prohibit these victims from ever seeing the future. They'll never live to see tomorrow. They'll never live to laugh or smile again. They'll never be able to fight for what they feel are worthy causes to move this country forward. They'll never be able to look Samuel Wurzelbacher in the eyes, stand up for the victims of gun violence, and do everything in their power to decrease the frequency of such happenings. If only we had done a better job of that before the tragedy occurred, they may still be alive today. Of course, according to Wurzelbacher, this would be an example of not caring about the victims of gun violence. With that kind of logic, those whom stand up for minorities' equal rights are racists, those whom stand up for women's equal rights are sexists, and those whom try to reduce child abuse are abusers themselves. Here I thought Joe the Plumber couldn't sound any dumber. Not only is Joe the Plumber the Douche of the Day, he's the a**hole of the year - and it's not even June. Congratulations, and how about looking those victims' families in the eyes and telling them what you wrote in an open letter. Yeah - best of luck with that...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/27/joe-the-plumber-guns_n_5397981.html

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/joe-the-plumber-guns-politicians

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...