Skip to main content

Why the moving-fast-and-then-pulling-back strategy almost never works

A good buddy of mine has recently fallen victim to the moving-fast-and-then-pulling-back strategy in the world of dating. While I feel bad for him, I know that parting ways with his wife will be better for him in the long-term. Unfortunately, many people attempt to conquer this strategy, and most fall very short of their goals.

When it comes to my friend, he was dating a woman for less than a year, the two of them were in college - just young and having fun - when she got pregnant. Since he was working for her father at the time, he felt stuck, and almost forced into asking her hand in marriage. He wasn't ready. She wasn't ready. But given the circumstances, he felt it was something he had to do. They then had to work backwards and tried getting to know one another better, and hoped that they actually liked what they discovered about the other. Unfortunately, having the child and focusing all their attention on him, they weren't able to really discover their true feelings for the other until several years down the road, and when that occurred, they soon realized what many already knew - the only reason they got married was the pregnancy. This is when everything fell apart, they drifted away from one another, and decided divorce would be the best option.

I notice this strategy in dating before marriage also, but just like with the before-mentioned scenario, this is incredibly difficult to make work as well. I've actually run into this situation on multiple occasions, where a woman and I will hit it off, vocally express interest in one another, flirt, but when I suggest we keep moving things forward, she'll say, "Oh, I'm not ready to date. I like you and all, but don't really want to pursue anything. Let's just be friends." While this probably isn't as difficult a situation to be in as the marriage scenario I outlined, it's still quite the trying experience. This is because in such predicaments, the two people have expressed to one another that they like each other, they've helped spark a progressive attraction through flirtation, and aided in the other's feelings expanding for them. Given all that, when one person comes forward and says, "I like how things are going. Let's keep moving this forward," and the other basically shoots them down, backtracks, and says, "Oh, I'm not ready. Let's just be friends," it's painful to the first person. He or she feels like they were misled, and after making themselves vulnerable, were rejected. With both people's feelings out in the open, as well as the semi-rejection, if the two decide to regress the relationship to just that of a friendship, it can be a pretty awkward experience. One person has to hide their feelings from the other, pretend that everything's fine, when knowing full well that's not the case. This can then have a significant affect on how they act around the other, which can make them appear phony, and the friendship as well.

Like almost anything else, it's extremely difficult to work backwards in a relationship. When two people reach a certain stage of any relationship, it's natural to expect that things will progress, and when one party tells the other they should regress, that significantly impacts a person's emotions and mindset. While I hesitate to say this strategy is "impossible" to pull off, I'd also say that it's ineffective approximately 99.346% of the time. When two people starting falling for each other, and at the last moment, one pulls back, the other is bound to fall flat on his or her face, get hurt in the process, and look up at the person they were falling for with a new-found sense of distrust, which will be extremely difficult to get over - essentially ending the relationship.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...