Skip to main content

Why do some lead others on?

On Saturday night, I went out with my dad to a local pub to see a band perform. While there, we bumped into a buddy of ours, who, at one point, said a certain lady was giving him the eye. So, when the two of them went outside to smoke and talk, she flirted with him, before out of the middle of nowhere, a massive man walked towards them, gave the woman a big hug and kiss, and in response, she said, "I've missed you." Our buddy then walked in, told us the story, and said, "Why lead me on like that? Why not just say her boyfriend, or whatever he is, was on the way? I would've then left her alone and started looking elsewhere." So, why do she and others lead people on? Since everyone is different, and due to that, there can be no universal reason as to why people lead others on, I do think there are a few common reasons why some people do this.

1. Attention - When some people notice that another has taken a liking to them, they may flirt and almost egg them on, because they like the attention, and like feeling special and attractive. Perhaps they just got out of a rough relationship, maybe they were rejected not too far back, perhaps they're a bit insecure, or maybe they're one of those whom always likes to be the center of attention. This is probably what the woman in the story from Saturday night was seeking. The reason for that is anyone's guess, but my friend had a right to be irritated by the series of events which took place.

2. Uncertainty - This can happen when a person thinks he or she may like the other, but doesn't know how much. So, instead of rejecting the person all together, they play along to see where it goes. This is a very dangerous strategy, because if this person discovers he or she doesn't care for the other person in the same way the other cares for them, depending on how long this little "game" lasts, it could end the relationship entirely.

3. Think they're being nice - I notice this with a lot of women, and even some guys. Some people just hate feeling mean and hurting others' feelings, so instead of telling an obviously interested person that they're not interested, they kind of shrug their shoulders and pretend they didn't hear the other's heartfelt sentiments, because in their eyes, rejection is a more hurtful tactic than this. However, that usually isn't the case, and the longer they carry on with this tactic, the more it's going to hurt the other's feelings in the end.

There are other reasons people lead others' on, but these are the first three that came to mind for me - and regardless of the reason, leading a person on is misleading, selfish, and hurtful. In the three before-mentioned examples, people in group #1 lead others on just to feel good about themselves, people in group #2 are stringing others along because of their indecisiveness, and people in group #3 aren't concerned with hurting others' feelings so much as they're concerned about feeling guilty for hurting others' feelings. Back in my college years, I regretfully admit that I resorted to tactic #3. However, after taking an extended break from the dating world, I can proudly say I haven't resorted to any of these tactics (or others) since that time. Why lead another on to make them feel you're interested when you're not? While the quick rejection may be temporarily painful, the sooner it occurs, the sooner they'll get over it, and the sooner they'll be able to look for someone who is actually interested rather than wasting their time with someone who's not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"