Skip to main content

Pre-election Politifact scorecards

We're about 24 hours away from election day (12 if you want to get technical), so I thought I'd share the presidential and vice presidential nominees' Politifact scorecards going into the big day.

Republican Ticket
Donald Trump
True: 4% (14 out of 328)
Mostly True: 11% (36 out of 328)
Half True/Half False: 15% (48 out of 328)
Mostly False: 19% (63 out of 328)
False: 34% (110 out of 328)
Pants on Fire: 17% (57 out of 328)

True/Mostly True: 15%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 70%
Net: -55%


Mike Pence
True: 11% (4 out of 38)
Mostly True: 11% (4 out of 38)
Half True/Half False: 32% (12 out of 38)
Mostly False: 21% (8 out of 38)
False: 26% (10 out of 38)
Pants on Fire: 0% (0 out of 38)

True/Mostly True: 22%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 47%
Net: -25%



Democratic Ticket
Hillary Clinton
True: 25% (72 out of 295)
Mostly True: 26% (76 out of 295)
Half True/Half False: 24% (69 out of 295)
Mostly False: 14% (40 out of 295)
False: 10% (29 out of 295)
Pants on Fire: 2% (7 out of 295)

True/Mostly True: 51%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 26%
Net: +25%


Tim Kaine
True: 20% (10 out of 51)
Mostly True: 29% (15 out of 51)
Half True/Half False: 29% (15 out of 51)
Mostly False: 16% (8 out of 51)
False: 6% (3 out of 51)
Pants on Fire: 0% (0 out of 51)

True/Mostly True: 49%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 22%
Net: +27%



Overall Numbers
Republican Ticket
True: 4.9% (18 out of 366)
Mostly True: 10.9% (40 out of 366)
Half True/Half False: 16.4% (60 out of 366)
Mostly False: 19.4% (71 out of 366)
False: 32.8% (120 out of 366)
Pants on Fire: 15.6% (57 out of 366)

True/Mostly True: 15.8%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 67.8%
Net: -52.0%

Democratic Ticket
True: 23.7% (82 out of 346)
Mostly True: 26.3% (91 out of 346)
Half True/Half False: 24.2% (84 out of 346)
Mostly False: 13.9% (48 out of 346)
False: 9.2% (32 out of 346)
Pants on Fire: 2.0% (7 out of 346)

True/Mostly True: 50.2%
False/Mostly False/Pants on Fire: 25.1%
Net: +25.1%

Difference: Democratic Ticket +77.1%/Republican Ticket -77.1%

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...