Skip to main content

Presidential election prediction (a week away)

We're just a week away from the 2016 presidential election. While I know a lot can happen in a week, here now are my state-by-state predictions at this current juncture:

Hillary Clinton (D)
Definites
1) Washington: 12 electoral votes, 12 total
2) Oregon: 7 electoral votes, 19 total
3) California: 55 electoral votes, 74 total
4) Hawaii: 4 electoral votes, 78 total
5) Illinois: 20 electoral votes, 98 total
6) Vermont: 3 electoral votes, 101 total
7) Massachusetts: 11 electoral votes, 112 total
8) Connecticut: 7 electoral votes, 119 total
9) Rhode Island: 4 electoral votes, 123 total
10) New Jersey: 14 electoral votes, 137 total
11) New York: 29 electoral votes, 166 total
12) Delaware: 3 electoral votes, 169 total
13) Maryland: 10 electoral votes, 179 total
14) Washington, D.C.: 3 electoral votes, 182 total

Probables
1) New Mexico: 5 electoral votes, 5 total
2) Colorado: 9 electoral votes, 14 total
3) Minnesota: 10 electoral votes, 24 total
4) Wisconsin: 10 electoral votes, 34 total
5) Michigan: 16 electoral votes, 50 total
6) Maine: 4 electoral votes, 54 total
7) New Hampshire: 4 electoral votes, 58 total
8) Pennsylvania: 20 electoral votes, 78 total
9) Virginia: 13 electoral votes, 91 total

Definites + Probables = 23 states (including D.C.) for 273 electoral votes

Questionables
1) Nevada: 6 electoral votes, 6 total
2) North Carolina: 15 electoral votes, 21 total
3) Florida: 29 electoral votes, 50 total

Definites + Probables + Questionables = 26 states (including D.C.) for 323 electoral votes


Donald Trump (R)
Definites
1) Idaho: 4 electoral votes, 4 total
2) Wyoming: 3 electoral votes, 7 total
3) North Dakota: 3 electoral votes, 10 total
4) South Dakota: 3 electoral votes, 13 total
5) Nebraska: 5 electoral votes, 18 total
6) Kansas: 6 electoral votes, 24 total
7) Oklahoma: 7 electoral votes, 31 total
8) Arkansas: 6 electoral votes, 37 total
9) Louisiana: 8 electoral votes, 45 total
10) Mississippi: 6 electoral votes, 51 total
11) Alabama: 9 electoral votes, 60 total
12) South Carolina: 9 electoral votes, 69 total
13) Kentucky: 8 electoral votes, 77 total
14) Tennessee: 11 electoral votes, 88 total
15) West Virginia: 5 electoral votes, 93 total

Probables
1) Montana: 3 electoral votes, 3 total
2) Missouri: 10 electoral votes, 13 total
3) Indiana: 11 electoral votes, 24 total

Definites + Probables = 18 states for 117 electoral votes

Questionables
1) Utah: 6 electoral votes, 6 total
2) Arizona: 11 electoral votes, 17 total
3) Alaska: 3 electoral votes, 20 total
4) Texas: 38 electoral votes, 58 total
5) Iowa: 6 electoral votes, 64 total
6) Ohio: 18 electoral votes, 82 total
7) Georgia: 16 electoral votes, 98 total

Definites + Probables + Questionables = 25 states for 215 electoral votes


My prediction as of November 1st, 2016

Hillary Clinton (D): 323 electoral votes

Donald Trump (R): 215 electoral votes

http://www.270towin.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"