Skip to main content

We're Better Than That

Life. Liberty. The pursuit of happiness. Opportunity.

Diversity. Acceptance. Dreams. Second chances.

Love. Tradition. Togetherness. Progression.

This is America, a great but imperfect nation - a nation that continues to grow, a nation of which I'm proud to be a part.

Today we have a choice on which direction we'd like to see our great nation go. Some may refuse to take part in letting their voices be heard, as they take for granted what many others lack. If we all took this choice for granted, we'd cease to be given a choice at all. The only way we can be part of a democracy is if we actively participate in a democracy. So no matter in which direction you want to see this nation go, get out there and vote.

Like with this country, we have two imperfect candidates, but that's where the similarities end. With Hillary Clinton, we have the known, the familiar, the experienced. She'll continue to build upon the 73 consecutive months of job growth we've seen under President Obama. She'll continue with President Obama's diplomacy-first-war-as-a-last-resort mindset. She'll appoint Supreme Court justices who uphold marriage equality, keep in tact the Affordable Care Act, maintain the Roe v. Wade decision, and provide the opportunity of overturning Citizens United. She'll try to tackle the serious issues of gun violence and global warming. She'll try to continue moving this great nation forward. With Donald Trump, we have the unknown, the unfamiliar, the inexperienced. No one's certain what it is he'll do, yet he's hinted he'll: Deport Dreamers; temporarily ban Muslims; help overturn Roe v. Wade, marriage equality, and the Affordable Care Act; punish women for abortions; ignore gun violence and global warming; act before thinking; and disrespect each and every demographic, including our veterans and the disabled.

In Donald Trump's America, we're to be ruled by fear and prejudices. We're better than that.

In Donald Trump's America, we're to take debunked conspiracy theories more seriously than facts. We're better than that.

In Donald Trump's America, we're to first resort to hate and violence. We're better than that.

In Donald Trump's America, we're to turn back the clock to a chapter in this country's history we often times try to ignore. We're better than that.

Racism. We're better than that. Sexism. We're better than that. Xenophobia. We're better than that. Homophobia. We're better than that. We're Americans, and each and every one of our brothers and sisters deserve equal opportunities, equal rights, and equal respect, regardless of their age, race, gender, creed, or orientation. If "the land of the free" only applies to some, for what did the "brave" fight? For what does our flag truly symbolize if it's selective on which of our citizens it represents? Only one of the two presidential nominees will attempt to uphold this country's grand principles and that's Hillary Clinton.

If all of this still doesn't convince you, I leave you with this: You're a patient about to undergo a potentially life-ending operation and you have two options for your surgeon: A) A doctor with 30 years of experience in the field; imperfect but well respect by her peers; an individual willing to work with any and everyone in order to make the surgery a success, or B) An individual without any experience in the field; without a medical license of any kind; a person more concerned about saving a buck than saving a life. Who would you choose? Doctor A), Hillary Clinton, or Doctor B), Donald Trump? This country may not be on life support, but we'd be foolish to select a phony doctor with no experience in an attempt to heal even our slightest of wounds.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"