Skip to main content

Freedom of Speech Doesn't Mean Freedom From Repercussions, But People Should Still Be Allowed to Speak

It's a tad surreal to be involved in comedy during this time in our history. Comedians have, throughout history, consistently tried pushing the envelope as far as appropriateness goes. In yesteryear, if a joke went too far, they'd remove it from their routine, try something else, and the earth would continue to move. That was before the advent of the Internet and social media, however. As times has progressed, so too has the call for increased sensitivities to all demographics. Nowadays, if a joke goes too far, social media sites like Twitter attempt to temporarily stop the world as they try and put the comedian out of business. There's always been a fine line for comedians to walk down, but that line has progressively become longer and narrower, making it ever more difficult to keep one's balance.

So where do we draw the line? This isn't just limited to comedians. Is there a similar balancing act politically-correct free speech supporters can walk to help preserve our First Amendment rights while also standing up to bigotry? This juggling act appears to be one of the big challenges in the era of social media. While it's perfectly acceptable, even admirable, to consistently stand up to hate, having a one-size-fits-all mentality when it comes to offensive content and attempting to silence those you don't agree with may do more harm than good in the end. Isn't that one big reason Donald Trump got elected president? Millions felt silenced; he, for whatever reason, gave them a voice; and the walking, talking disaster known as Drumpf is now in the Oval Office as a result. Attempting to silence haters tends to only exacerbate their hatred, to the point where we have a sexual predator white supremacist in the White House. What is the right answer? I personally don't know, but we've tried the silence-them route before and look where that got us. Perhaps we need to try a different strategy. We can't change hearts and minds if we refuse to acknowledge and listen to them. While hatred should never be tolerated, it can't be ignored, for admission, not ignorance, of a problem is the first step to solving it. We can't solve a problem if we pretend it doesn't exist.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...