Skip to main content

I'm officially anti-foul out

I've been trending this way for a while, but it's now official: I'm anti-foul out in basketball. After pondering about it some more, I think it may be the stupidest rule in all of sports, especially if a game goes to overtime.

In what other sport does a player get kicked out for committing five or six potentially minor infractions? In what sport do fans pay good money to watch the officials kick out a star player over watching said star player? If the goal of a season is to discover which team is the best, how is it then logical to kick out the best players because they lightly tapped an opponent on the wrist 5 or 6 times during the course of a game? Can you imagine if New England Patriots MVP Super Bowl-winning quarterback Tom Brady got kicked out of a playoff game because he was responsible for 5 or 6 false start and/or delay of game penalties? Ridiculous, right? That's how stupid the foul-out rule is in basketball.

Fouls aren't objective. While referees may be professionals and get paid a hefty sum for their work, they're human, and due to that, they make mistakes. How many times have we seen a borderline charge/block call go the opposite way we were thinking and result in a key player fouling out? In football, what would we be saying if an offensive lineman got kicked out for committing his 5th or 6th borderline holding call? Yes, the guy would be hurting his team with the penalty yards, but should he be ejected on top of that? Eh, no.

The foul-out rule is at its most ludicrous when games go to overtime. College basketball games last 40 minutes (no, I'm not accounting for commercials, timeouts, and halftimes). Players foul out when they reach number 5. So, on average, a player has to commit a foul once every 8 minutes of gametime to foul out. In the 2009 Big East tournament, Syracuse and Connecticut played a game that went into not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not even 5, but 6 overtimes. Overtimes last 5 minutes a piece. In other words, in this game, there were 30 additional minutes played to the 40 in regulation, totalling 70. Even though the game nearly doubled in length, the rule stayed at 5-and-you're-out. So, in this game, a player had to average a foul every 14 minutes to foul out. Yes, by the time this contest was over, so many players had fouled out, 70-year-old head coaches Jim Boeheim and Jim Calhoun were playing point guard for their respective teams.

Games, teams, and players shouldn't be defined by minor infractions. It's not what fans want; what players want; what coaches want; or what television executives want. There's a reason the foul out rule doesn't exist in any other sport. To put it eloquently, it sucks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"