Skip to main content

WTF kind of a speech was that?!?

While I refused to watch it live on television, I did watch Donald Trump's Oval Office address later in the evening online, as well as the Democratic response. My first thought was, "WTF was that!?!?"

The man was more monotone than a sleep-talking Ben Stein giving an impression of a robot. He spoke more slowly than a sloth nicknamed Ben Carson. Trump snorted more than a coke-addict, nicknamed Sniffles, with a sinus infection. Also, it's not like he said anything new. He repeated the same old talking points (lies) he's been uttering since he was 12: "We need to build a wall;" "It's about national security;" "Lots of drugs coming in;" "The shutdown is the Democrats' fault;" etc. If I wanted to watch reruns, I'd tune into TBS.

I'm not a fan of hyperbole, but this isn't hyperbole; it's the truth. Last night's Oval Office address was the worst, most boring, least persuasive speech I've ever seen. President Deal-Maker is obviously a con-man, for he's worse at making deals than Brett Kavanaugh is of saying no to boofing.
Labels:

Comments

  1. SarcasmMyShieldJanuary 11, 2019 at 1:05 AM

    I'm seriously thinking that if we locked Snortle-Dee and Snortle-Dum in the same room, they could literally sniffle all the oxygen out of said room. We'll be sure to mark this occasion down in that special calendar, somewhere between beer and boofing...
    Great post, and yay :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more