Skip to main content

Andrew Luck's performance has been overblown

For the record, I have absolutely nothing against the Indianapolis Colts or their rookie quarterback Andrew Luck. If anything, I'm pulling for them this year, largely due to the unfortunate situation concerning their head coach Chuck Pagano and his battle with leukemia. However, I think Luck's been given far too much credit for the team's success this year. This was also the case on Sunday in the Colts' 27-23 win over the Tennessee Titans, as Luck completed just 16 of 34 pass attempts (47.1%) for 196 yards (5.8 per attempt), 1 touchdown, and 2 interceptions, for a very poor quarterback rating of 50.6. He was also sacked four times, which amounted to a loss of 25 yards.

I have to give the Colts credit for finding ways to win this year, going from the #1 draft pick last year to 9-4 and playoff bound this year. However, they have played one of the easiest, if not the easiest schedule in all of football this year. In their 9 victories this year, they came against teams with a combined record of 45-72 (.385) by a combined 49 points (5.4 per). They've only beaten two teams with winning records (Minnesota and Green Bay) and both games came early in the season. Eight of their nine wins have come by seven points or less - with the lone exception being a 17-point victory over 2-11 Jacksonville. Their four losses came to teams with a combined record of 25-26 (.490) by a combined 86 points (21.5 per). Only two of the four teams had winning records (Chicago and New England). They fell to 2-11 Jacksonville and 6-7 New York (Jets) earlier this season. Left on their slate are two games against the team with the best record in all of football - Houston (11-1) and sandwiched in between is a game with the team with the worst record in football in Kansas City (2-11) (tied with Jacksonville).

As for Andrew Luck, the guy has been clutch in the 4th quarter of these close games. However, his overall numbers are very average and very rookie-like. He seems to be emulating a young Eli Manning, where he's been off for three quarters and finds a way to kick things in gear in the final fifteen minutes.  Of 36 NFL starting quarterbacks, Andrew Luck ranks 33rd in completion percentage at 54.9. He's right in the middle of the pack in yards per completion - ranking 18th at 7.06 yards. He's tied for the league lead in interceptions with 18 (alongside Drew Brees). He's tied for 3rd in the league in sacks, being tackled behind the line of scrimmage 32 times. Lastly, he's ranked 31st out of 36 in quarterback rating at 74.5 (only ahead of rookies Brandon Weeden and Ryan Tannehill of Cleveland and Miami, Mark Sanchez of the Jets, Matt Cassel of Kansas City, and John Skelton of Arizona). I think Andrew Luck is a very smart quarterback and when all is said and done, barring serious injury, will be a Peyton Manning-like presence behind center for the Indianapolis Colts for some time. However, the guy has been largely aided by the Colts' soft schedule. In 13 games, the Colts have only played four teams with winning records (30.8%). The Colts have had a very good and surprising season, and Andrew Luck appears to be a very promising young quarterback, however, I think many of these analysts are kind of blowing things out of proportion when talking about how good both the team and their rookie quarterback are at this point in the season (and his career).

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/ind/indianapolis-colts

http://espn.go.com/nfl/standings

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"