Skip to main content

Dallas Cowboys 38 Philadelphia Eagles 33

It's a sad day for Philadelphia Eagles fans when their team falls to division-rival Dallas and many are left with a look on their face which says, "Well, that wasn't too bad." That's exactly what happened last night when the Eagles dropped their 8th straight - this one to the Dallas Cowboys by the final score of 38-33.

There is good news to be had in light of last night's game, however. No, it wasn't the defense. The defense was as putrid as ever. It really says something about a defense when Chris Collinsworth refers to their performance on a Sunday night game as "much improved" when the team allowed the opposing quarterback (Tony Romo in this case) to complete 22 of 27 pass attempts for 303 yards (11.2 per attempt), 3 touchdowns, and an almost perfect quarterback rating of 150.5. In Collinsworth's defense, the Eagles defense did allow Washington's Robert Griffin III to have a perfect 158.3 quarterback rating a couple weeks ago, so I suppose the 150.5 they allowed to Romo was a slight improvement.

No, the good news I'm talking about is with regard to offense and special teams. The special teams unit has been slowly improving through the weeks and place kicker Alex Henery has been as solid as any kicker in the NFL this year - having not missed a field goal since the first game of the season. Return specialist Damaris Johnson tried making things interesting toward the tail-end of the game as well. Down 38-27 without much time left in the game, Johnson returned a punt 98 yards for a score to bring the Eagles to within five at 38-33.

As for the offense, one has to give these guys some credit. The Eagles were without starting quarterback Michael Vick, starting running back LeSean McCoy, and starting wideout DeSean Jackson. Even without three of their most explosive players on offense, the Eagles were rather efficient for the evening. Rookie quarterback Nick Foles was given some more freedom and flexibility with the playcalling and rookie tailback Bryce Brown, outside of another lost fumble, had a stellar game. Brown carried the ball 24 times for 169 yards (7.0 average) and 2 touchdowns. Since McCoy went down a couple weeks ago, Brown has carried the ball 43 times for 347 yards (8.1 average) and 4 touchdowns. He has also lost three fumbles in that same time-span, but if he's able to work on that, it appears as if the Eagles have found themselves another great tailback-in-the-making in Brown.

As for Foles, of his three starts, last night's was the best. He looked rather rusty in his first start against Washington. He wasn't given much to work with in his second start against Carolina. Last night, it finally felt as if the coaches were ready to truly see what the guy could do. Granted, he did almost throw another pick 6 and I'm still not entirely sold on arm on deep balls, but the guy seems to be rather alert, bright, and efficient with the short and intermediate routes. For the game, Foles finished 22 of 34 for 251 yards (7.4 per attempt - vastly improved on the 5.7 from last week), and 1 touchdown, for a quarterback rating of 96.6. As is common for young quarterbacks, he threw it to his tight end rather regularly - with Brent Celek finishing the game having caught 7 passes for 73 yards. Foles did spread the ball around a bit better to his receivers than he had his first couple games. The wideouts caught a total of 10 passes for 161 yards and a touchdown (Riley Cooper).

The offensive line played better last night too. Foles was only sacked once and hurried a handful of other times, it seems - which is remarkably less than both he and Vick had been hurried for much of the season.

Unfortunately for the Eagles, even with the improvements I saw on offense and special teams, they still found a way to lose at game's end, falling to 3-9 on the year. It's not going to get any easier for the club either. Up next on the slate will be a road test against Tampa Bay, who at 6-6, is fighting for their playoff lives. They'll play Cincinnati at home, who is also in the midst of the playoff race. They'll then close the year with two in-division games, playing Washington at home and the Giants on the road - Washington still with an outside shot at a wild card (especially if they beat the Giants tonight), and the Giants are definitely in the middle of the playoff race. As sad as it is to say, I find it difficult seeing the Eagles winning again this year. With that, I don't see much point in giving Vick or McCoy many reps the rest of the way. The team is 3-9, well on their way to 3-13 and a top 5 draft pick. It's time to look to the future and see if Foles, Brown, and other youngsters will have what it takes in the years to come, or if the team will need to start looking to fill those holes in the coming off-season.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/phi/philadelphia-eagles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"