Skip to main content

Colorado State Senator Bernie Herpin: "Maybe it was a good thing James Holmes had a 100-round magazine..."

In July of 2012, James Holmes killed 12 people and injured 70 others when he opened fire in a Colorado movie theater for a premiere of the film Dark Knight Rises. Holmes had brought with him the following - all of which he purchased off the Internet: Ballistic gear, firearms, and high-capacity magazine clips (100-round clips) - all which totaled over $15,000. Colorado has since passed a law banning high-capacity clips, and yesterday, a discussion took place among two State Senators with regard to whether or not the new law should be repealed. The conversation between Senators Irene Aguilar (Democrat) and Bernie Herpin (Republican) went like this:

Aguilar: "My understanding is that James Holmes bought his 100-round capacity magazine legally. So in fact, this law would have stopped James Holmes from purchasing a 100-round magazine. I was wondering if you agree with me."

Herpin: "Perhaps, James Holmes would not have been able to purchase a 100-round magazine. As it turned out, that was maybe a good thing that he had a 100-round magazine, because it jammed. If he had four, five, six 15-round magazines, there's no telling how much damage he could have done until a good guy with a gun showed up."

A good thing? Really? Twelve people died that day, seventy others were injured, and he thinks it was a good thing that James Holmes had a 100-round magazine because it's prone to jamming? He doesn't think there would have been any chance a person (or persons) would have pummeled Holmes after he got through the first 15-round magazine? Perhaps Bernie Herpin should do his math. With this jammed 100-round magazine, 82 people were either hurt or killed. Going by that same percentage, here are how many people would have suffered similar fates if the law had been passed prior to the incident:

One 15-round magazine: 12.3 (12)

Two 15-round magazines: 24.6 (25)

Three 15-round magazines: 36.9 (37)

Four 15-round magazines: 49.2 (49)

Five 15-round magazines: 61.5 (62)

Six 15-round magazines: 73.8 (74)

So, even if James Holmes had gotten through six 15-round magazines, chances are approximately eight fewer people would have been impacted, and I have an extremely hard time believing that at least one person wouldn't have taken him down well before that point. Anyway, Senator Herpin, you were saying...

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/13/3289411/colorado-aurora-magazines-good-thing/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...