After Arizona Governor Jan Brewer (Republican) vetoed SB 1062, which would have made it legal for professionals in the state to refuse service or employment to homosexuals on religious grounds, she's been on the receiving end of some lovely tweets from fellow conservatives, such as the following:
"CNN led full court media press to take away rights of Christians. Just the beginning. Using tolerance as weapon against us. Wake up." - John Nolte
Using tolerance as a weapon against Christians? Whom supposedly believe in and worship Jesus, who, rumor has it, was extremely tolerant, and preached love? Who should wake up again? ::points toward Nolte::
"Not sure what the GOP stands for when it stands against religious freedom out of pure fear of political correctness." - Ben Shapiro
For at least one day of the year, the GOP stands for tolerance, so, congratulations! Oh, wait... That's not a good thing? Well, like I said - it was one day... Mr. Shapiro and his ilk are attempting to make certain the event was just a blip on the radar. Onward with the bigotry! ::rolls eyes::
"Brewer vote shows that poorly informed hysteria works." - Rich Lowry
Poorly informed hysteria? Right... So, if the bill was signed into law and we had this following experience (courtesy of Seinfeld), it wouldn't be a big deal?
Gay man: "I would like some of the..."
Soup Nazi: "Wait a minute! Are you one of them?!? Are you a gay?!?"
Gay man: "Well, yes, yes I am..."
Soup Nazi: "No soup for you!"
So, Rich, if Christians had been on the gay man end of that equation, would that not have been cause for "poorly informed hysteria" as well? ::gives the yank-yank motion::
"Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer makes Christians in her state second class citizens." - Todd Starnes
Right... Just like when blacks were considered to be more than 3/5 of a person, the government was treating whites as second-class citizens, and when women were finally given the right to vote, men were being treated like second-class citizens. In this case, Christians can't refuse service to gays, so it's the Christians whom are being treated like second-class citizens. Yet, if the bill had passed and some Christians did refuse service to the LGBT community, Mr. Starnes would firmly believe that Christians' rights were simply being upheld and gays' rights would be right where they should be - equal to that of second-class citizens... Idiot... ::shakes head::
"Tony Perkins on Fox: AZ veto was due to misinformation spread by the hired left. Who's going to protect the rights of Christians?" - Jeremy W. Peters
What? Protect their rights to go to church? Worship? Read the Bible? Go to Sunday school? Go to Bible study? Pray? Believe in Jesus? Get baptized? Partake in communion? Donate money to the church? Can't Christians already do all that? Oh, he means to practice bigotry against homosexuals... Well, when tempted with such words and behavior, perhaps they should ask themselves this question - "What would Jesus do?" ::points to 1 John 4:8::
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/27/conservative-pundits-arizona-bill_n_4865482.html
http://www.openbible.info/topics/god_loves_everyone
"CNN led full court media press to take away rights of Christians. Just the beginning. Using tolerance as weapon against us. Wake up." - John Nolte
Using tolerance as a weapon against Christians? Whom supposedly believe in and worship Jesus, who, rumor has it, was extremely tolerant, and preached love? Who should wake up again? ::points toward Nolte::
"Not sure what the GOP stands for when it stands against religious freedom out of pure fear of political correctness." - Ben Shapiro
For at least one day of the year, the GOP stands for tolerance, so, congratulations! Oh, wait... That's not a good thing? Well, like I said - it was one day... Mr. Shapiro and his ilk are attempting to make certain the event was just a blip on the radar. Onward with the bigotry! ::rolls eyes::
"Brewer vote shows that poorly informed hysteria works." - Rich Lowry
Poorly informed hysteria? Right... So, if the bill was signed into law and we had this following experience (courtesy of Seinfeld), it wouldn't be a big deal?
Gay man: "I would like some of the..."
Soup Nazi: "Wait a minute! Are you one of them?!? Are you a gay?!?"
Gay man: "Well, yes, yes I am..."
Soup Nazi: "No soup for you!"
So, Rich, if Christians had been on the gay man end of that equation, would that not have been cause for "poorly informed hysteria" as well? ::gives the yank-yank motion::
"Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer makes Christians in her state second class citizens." - Todd Starnes
Right... Just like when blacks were considered to be more than 3/5 of a person, the government was treating whites as second-class citizens, and when women were finally given the right to vote, men were being treated like second-class citizens. In this case, Christians can't refuse service to gays, so it's the Christians whom are being treated like second-class citizens. Yet, if the bill had passed and some Christians did refuse service to the LGBT community, Mr. Starnes would firmly believe that Christians' rights were simply being upheld and gays' rights would be right where they should be - equal to that of second-class citizens... Idiot... ::shakes head::
"Tony Perkins on Fox: AZ veto was due to misinformation spread by the hired left. Who's going to protect the rights of Christians?" - Jeremy W. Peters
What? Protect their rights to go to church? Worship? Read the Bible? Go to Sunday school? Go to Bible study? Pray? Believe in Jesus? Get baptized? Partake in communion? Donate money to the church? Can't Christians already do all that? Oh, he means to practice bigotry against homosexuals... Well, when tempted with such words and behavior, perhaps they should ask themselves this question - "What would Jesus do?" ::points to 1 John 4:8::
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/27/conservative-pundits-arizona-bill_n_4865482.html
http://www.openbible.info/topics/god_loves_everyone
Comments
Post a Comment