Skip to main content

South: 2'' of snow here = Hurricane Sandy in the Northeast

In light of the 2'' of snow some portions of the Southeast got last week and the teasing they received from comedians due to how massive they made the storm out to be, some such residents posted this meme on Facebook:

"So you're from the Northeast and making fun of people in the South who are in a mess because of the snow? Please tell me again how well you all handled Hurricane Sandy and the aftermath. Oh, the North just is not used to it? You don't say. Same for the South and snow. Now sit down and shut up!"

This is a ridiculous comparison on multiple fronts. First off, when just comparing the size of the storms, Hurricane Sandy was a category 3 hurricane, where winds reached up to 115 mph, and the storm resulted in 286 casualties and over $68 billion in damage. It was the most destructive hurricane of 2012 and the second-costliest in this country's history. The snowstorm in the South - Atlanta, in particular - resulted in 13 deaths and closer to $68 in damage than $68 million. On this front, this comparison is about as ridiculous as comparing Columbine to the Holocaust.

Secondly, while it seems as if many parts of the Southeast, such as Atlanta, are much poorer in preparation for snow than other parts of the country, no part of the country is 100% prepared for a category 3 hurricane like Sandy. So, once again, the meme's comparison is completely asinine.

According to The Weather Channel, the five most destructive hurricanes in U.S. history all occurred in the South:

1. Galveston, Texas

2. Southeast Florida/Lake Okeechobee 

3. Mississippi/Louisiana (Katrina)

4. Louisiana

5. Georgia/South Carolina

So, no, while the Northeast may not have been used to handling a hurricane the caliber of Sandy, no one is, and it's utterly ridiculous to compare that to not being able to properly manage 2'' of snow in the South. With that mentality, if the South received the 6-10' of snow central Ohio is supposed to get later today, I can just envision many such residents jumping out of buildings, screaming, "It's Armageddon!"

http://www.weather.com/tv/tvshows/hurricane-week/most-devastating-hurricanes-20130713

https://www.google.com/#q=hurricane+sandy

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/01/29/snowstorm-travel-disruption-south/5010845/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"