Skip to main content

Psst... Pro-Lifers - the abortion rate is lower under Obama than at any time since '73

Hard-core conservative evangelicals seem to obsess over two things - gay marriage and especially abortion. Leading up to the 2008 and 2012 elections, many referred to candidate and President Obama as a baby-killer. However, while the president may be pro-choice, a new study shows that the 2011 abortion rate is lower than at any time since 1973.

The Guttmacher Institute just published a paper which showed that as of 2011, of every 1,000 impregnated women, only 17 had abortions. That is a decrease of 13% from 2008.

So why the dramatic drop? It's not the anti-abortion laws that were passed by Republicans, since many of those hadn't fully taken effect by 2011. One main factor was a greater reliance on birth control, which these same conservative evangelicals have also criticized. Several "Christian" organizations have even taken the healthcare law to court over requiring them to cover birth control in women's healthcare plans.

So, what's it going to be? If people are less educated about contraception due to abstinence-only education and don't have as much access to attain birth control, this will result in more unwanted pregnancies and with that, more abortions. If people receive an adequate sex education and are more readily supplied with different forms of contraception, the result will be fewer unwanted pregnancies and fewer abortions. Many of these far-right conservatives seem to want to live in a make-believe world, where no one has sex until marriage, and when they do, all sexual encounters are void of any kind of birth control and every pregnancy will go smoothly. In the real world, that's not the case. Many people do have sex before marriage, and even when they get married, many will use some form of birth control until they feel completely ready to have children. Also, last I heard, not every pregnancy went perfectly, unfortunately.

So, what's it going to be, far-right? Sex education, easier access to contraception, and fewer abortions, or abstinence-only education, less access to contraception, and more abortions? It's your call, but if you truly believe yourselves to be "pro-life," you'll support comprehensive sex education and easier access to contraception. If not, I'm afraid you might as well just call yourselves pro-abortion.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/study-abortion-rate-at-lowest-point-since-1973/2014/02/02/8dea007c-8a9b-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"