Skip to main content

Missouri constitution-obsessors being unconstitutional

What seems to be the far-right's favorite line when debating gun control?

"Read the Constitution!"

Given that, I find it ironically humorous that the Missouri Senate's General Laws Committee, dominated by the Republican Party, last week voted 5-1 in favor of a bill which would make it a crime for federal law enforcement to enforce this country's gun laws. The bill states that the punishment for such "crimes" would be up to a year in prison and a maximum fine of $1,000. It would also call on school personnel to be armed, as well as for lowering the age to obtain a concealed weapons permit from 21 to 19.

Yet the Constitution states that federal laws "shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the country notwithstanding."

In other words, perhaps the Missouri Senate General Laws Committee should heed their own argument - "Read the Constitution!"

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/03/3237961/missouri-senate-committee-votes-jail-federal-agents-enforce-gun-laws/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...