Skip to main content

NFL Divisional Round Playoff Predictions

Saturday
Game: Kansas City at New England

Prediction: Kansas City - I know odds would have it that the New England Patriots, led by Bill Belichick and Tom Brady, at Foxboro, following a bye week, is a near victory guarantee. However, I'm going against the odds on this one. When it comes to wins and losses, no team is hotter than the Kansas City Chiefs, who have reeled off 11 straight victories since starting the season 1-5, including a 30-0 thrashing on the road against Houston last week in the Wild Card round. New England may be healthier than they've been, but that's not saying a whole lot, and so long as the Pats' offensive line plays as they've been playing, Tom Brady won't be nearly as effective as he's been in past such situations. I'm going with the upset - the Chiefs on the road by 4.

Result: New England 27 Kansas City 20

Record: 0-1


Game: Green Bay at Arizona

Prediction: Arizona - Who was that Green Bay Packers team that steamrolled the Washington Redskins on the road 35-17 last weekend? I'm not sure, but am now fairly confident in saying the 'Skins weren't nearly as good as most had been claiming, meaning the NFC East was just THAT bad this year. Aaron Rodgers, for the first time in what seems like an eternity, was given time in the pocket against Washington last weekend, and that's going to be far from the case against the aggressive Arizona Cardinals front seven. Expect Rodgers to be on his butt more times than he'd like throughout this contest and for the rested Cardinals to light up the mediocre Packers defense. I'll go with Arizona by 10.

Result: Arizona 26 Green Bay 20 OT

Record: 1-1


Sunday
Game: Seattle at Carolina

Prediction: Seattle - Heading into the playoffs, Seattle was seen by many as the hottest team in the NFC, perhaps in all the NFL, and the ONE team nobody wanted to play. Heading to round two of the playoffs, they're lucky to still be a part of the postseason. It's not every day an NFL kicker misses a 27-yard-game-winning field goal. Not only that, but Seattle's big play of the game was a mishandled snap by Russell Wilson, which he turned into a miracle play to set up the Seahawks' only touchdown. Is it just me, or does this feel like one of those crazy destiny seasons, and I don't even believe in such things? Seattle got hot at the right time, got extremely lucky at the best time, and is getting healthier just in time to face the 15-1 Carolina Panthers, who beat the Seahawks earlier in the season with a late fourth quarter comeback, largely aided by their tight end, Greg Olsen. Seattle's improved quite significantly on both sides of the ball since then and I look for this playoff-experienced team to make the most of their fortunes last week, fix their mistakes from the team's first meeting, and to move on to the NFC Championship game for the third consecutive year with a 3 point win on the road.

Result: Carolina 31 Seattle 24

Record: 1-2


Game: Pittsburgh at Denver

Prediction: Pittsburgh - Last weekend was kind of crazy in the NFL. While I predicted the Super Bowl to feature Seattle and Pittsburgh, I'll be the first to say both teams are incredibly fortunate to be in the divisional round. Like Seattle last weekend, Pittsburgh appeared to have luck on their side in their 18-16 win against Cincinnati. Also, like with the Seahawks, I think Pittsburgh is going to make the most of their fortunes in a hard-fought victory in Denver. While the Steelers' defense has been up and down this season, they played better down the stretch, including in their win against the Bengals last weekend, and I trust Ben Roethlisberger and the Steelers offense to score some points in this contest than I do Peyton Manning and the Broncos offense. I'll go with Pittsburgh by 4.

Result: Denver 23 Pittsburgh 16

Record: 1-3

Divisional Round Record: 1-3 (.250)

Playoff Record: 4-4 (.500)

Overall Record: 155-109 (.587)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"