Skip to main content

White people finally have a dating site! Woo-hoo!

There are dating sites which cater to: Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, gays, lesbians, farmers, Ayn Rand fans, even the Amish (yes, I find that difficult to believe as well). Well, thanks to Sam Russell, we have now covered every demographic in the online dating world, courtesy of the site, Where White People Meet. That's right, white people finally have a dating site too!

When asked about the site, Mr. Russell said, "It's about equal opportunity. The last thing in the world I am is racist. I dated a black woman once. I helped raise a young black man... I just believe it's hypocrisy to say 'one group can do this, but another can't.'"

Yes, while it would be difficult for a racist white man to date a black woman, it's not impossible, and I've found it quite common for "closet racists" to deny any hints of racism by name-dropping a friend or ex-girlfriend whom is of a different race. Sure, I've dated women of about each and every race, but if I ever reached a point where I felt the need to combat accusations of racism by saying, "Hey, I dated a black woman once," chances are I'd be in trouble.

Also, while I'm in no way claiming Sam Russell to be a racist, I have a hunch he created a site with such a name to draw attention, and with that, potentially gain members. Whether or not he's successful with his venture through shock appeal is up for debate, but one thing is for certain - the man's site is silly, pointless, and he appears to be rather uneducated on the history and demographics of this country.

I hear these arguments all the time from typically white straight conservative Christian males:

- "Why can there be a Black History Month and not a White History Month?"

- "What's the deal with blacks having BET? Why can't whites have WET?"

- "Did you hear about the new show, Black-ish? Just imagine if someone created a show called, White-ish!"

The problem with these arguments is a lack of seeing the forest for the trees. Whites are still the majority in this country. Most channels could constitute as White Entertainment Channels; most months could be labeled as White History Months; and most shows could be called something along the lines of White-ish. This is why many minorities resort to channels such as BET, why they get recognized for fighting uphill battles in an effort to garner equality in this country (you know, like slavery) via Black History Month, and why some even feel compelled to join dating sites where they can meet other minorities.

Given all of that, what is the point of a dating site called Where White People Meet in this country? As of 2014, there was an estimated 319 million people in the U.S., almost 200 million of whom were white. In other words, whether a person joins Match.com, EHarmony.com, OKCupid.com, or another dating site in this country, the majority of people on there are going to be white. By creating a site called Where White People Meet, Sam Russell makes it sound as if it's incredibly difficult for white people to bump into one another in this country. While I can understand him trying to garner attention to his site and all, he's incredibly mistaken, and sounds quite ridiculous in the process. If others were to follow Sam Russell's lead, they could create the following dating sites:

- How to Meet the Living

- How to Meet Blacks (in Ghana)

- How to Meet Muslims (in Afghanistan)

- How to Meet Tall People (in the NBA)

- How to Meet Donald Trump supporters (in mental institutions)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/where-white-people-meet-founder-says-site-is-not-racially-motivated_568bd988e4b014efe0db9c23

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

http://qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"