Skip to main content

Super Bowl Prediction

Going into the season, who would have honestly predicted this match-up? Denver, led by an aging and oft-injured quarterback (in recent seasons) - Peyton Manning - fell to Indianapolis early in the playoffs last year and appeared to be headed for similar fortunes this year. This was especially the case considering that Manning got banged up, was replaced by Brock Osweiler, and regardless of who was behind center, the offense failed to click throughout a large majority of the season. Manning took over the starting spot to lead his Broncos to a come-from-behind win over San Diego late in the regular season, which aided Denver to clinching home-field advantage throughout the (AFC) playoffs. On the year, Manning threw 9 touchdown passes, while tossing 17 interceptions. The ground game was inconsistent as well. So how did the team garner the 1-seed in the AFC and reach the Super Bowl? Their defense. Even when the offense was off its game and turning the ball over, the defense found ways to keep the Broncos in games, often taking things into their own hands, literally, and winning the game with a pick-6. The team is somewhat reminiscent of Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Baltimore Ravens teams of the past, who relied heavily on playing things conservatively on offense, and busting through with big plays on special teams and defense, en route to Super Bowl victories. So long as Denver doesn't turn the ball over, they've always got a chance.

Carolina, meanwhile, was coming off a 7-8-1 season, and lost their best receiver, Kelvin Benjamin, before the season even started. Cam Newton was banged up off and on throughout the season a year ago, and for as often as the man gets hit (in or out of the pocket), it's never a certainty he'll last through the duration of the season. Also, like with most other dual-threat quarterbacks, the Panthers' coaches had yet to find a way to call plays which would maximize Newton's potential. Well, that was until this season. Newton was often smart when he ran the football, limiting the big hits he took out of the pocket. Not only that, but the former Heisman Trophy winner greatly improved on his passing, making the most of the limited talent around him. When tight end Greg Olsen is your main receiving threat, you're limited weapons in the passing game. So how did the seemingly undermanned Panthers do? 15-1, with their only loss coming late in the season to NFC South rival Atlanta. Yeah, there's a good reason why most experts and analysts feel Newton is the inevitable league MVP. I'm inclined to agree.

So, like I said, anyone who claims they predicted this Super Bowl match-up preseason is either high, a die-hard Broncos and Panthers fan (for whatever reason), or lying. I know I didn't. I took Pittsburgh and Seattle. In any case, as far as the actual match-up goes, while I think Manning will play it safe behind center and the Broncos defense will keep the team in the game, I have a hard time seeing the Panthers losing this one. For as great as Denver's defense has been this season, they haven't seen a quarterback like Cam Newton this year. Just ask Seattle and Arizona, two of the top defenses in the league, what it's like to face Newton. Cam and company lit up the Seahawks and Cardinals for 80 points in the Panthers two playoff games to this point. No, I don't see Carolina continuing to carry that average of 40 points per postseason game against Denver, but I see them scoring enough to come out with the franchise's first Super Bowl victory. The Panthers are clicking in all phases of the game at the right time, and while Denver's defense is arguably the best in the league, their offense won't be able to muster enough points to provide Peyton Manning with a storybook ending.

Prediction: Carolina 27 Denver 20

Result: 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"