Skip to main content

NFL Wild Card Round Predictions

Saturday
Game: Kansas City at Houston

Prediction: Kansas City - These two teams started the year a combined 3-10, but finished the year a combined 17-2. Houston's defense has been stepping up a great deal in recent weeks, but then again, so has Kansas City's. The Chiefs, winners of ten in a row, have a more consistent quarterback in Alex Smith, finally have a vertical threat in Jeremy Maclin, and should be able to score just enough points to eek out a win. I'll take Kansas City on the road by a field goal.

Result: Kansas City 30 Houston 0

Record: 1-0


Game: Pittsburgh at Cincinnati

Prediction: Pittsburgh - A lot depends on the health and readiness of Cincinnati quarterback Andy Dalton. If he's fully healthy, isn't being rushed back, and doesn't showcase much rust in his return, I'd be inclined to go with the Bengals at home. However, I don't believe that's going to be the case, and unfortunately for Dalton, Marvin Lewis, and the Bengals, I'm sensing another first-round postseason loss. I'll go with the Steelers by a touchdown.

Result: Pittsburgh 18 Cincinnati 16

Record: 2-0


Sunday
Game: Seattle at Minnesota

Prediction: Seattle - Minnesota is an up-and-coming team, but given how hot Seattle is, how the Seahawks pummeled the Vikings not long ago, and not believing Minnesota has been able to figure out and fix all the problems they had in the teams' first meeting, I have to give the edge to Seattle. I'll take the Seahawks by 10.

Result: Seattle 10 Minnesota 9

Record: 3-0


Game: Green Bay at Washington

Prediction: Washington - Of the four Wild Card games, this was the most difficult for me to pick. Based on name and reputation, I have to imagine most analysts will go with Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers. Having seen the Packers go 4-6 in their final ten games (including one win via a hail mary), how their offensive line and receivers have struggled, though, I'm not going to do that. Washington has played well at home all season, has been playing more consistently of late, and I'm going to give the edge to them at home in this one. I'll take Washington by 4.

Result: Green Bay 35 Washington 18

Record: 3-1


Wild Card Round Record: 3-1 (.750)

Overall Record: 154-106 (.592)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"