Skip to main content

Birther Sean Hannity claims birther Donald Trump is getting birther-ized

Apparently Sean Hannity knows similes like Motley Crue groupies know abstinence, for he recently said this:

"Democrats, members of the destroy-Trump media will not stop pushing this phony Russia-Trump collusion narrative despite no evidence. This has now become, like, Russia-Trump conspiracy, birther conspiracies, you know? Sort of truthers." 

No, they're not alike at all actually. It's not even an apples-and-oranges argument. It's more like an apples-and-Old-Country-Buffet argument. Sean Hannity, Donald Trump and other birthers felt that then President Barack Obama's birth certificate was forged. That claim was debunked time and time again, yet they still had doubts about its authenticity. There was never any FBI investigation on whether or not Obama was a legalized citizen of this country. There were never any hearings held by the Senate Intelligence Committee, where Obama Cabinet appointees were inquired about whether or not they had heard anything regarding the debunked claim that the former president had been born in Kenya. A special counsel was never appointed to delve deeper into the mystery that was Barack Obama's birth certificate. There was never serious chatter about possibly impeaching Obama due to the debunked theory that he was not born in this country. President Obama showcased his birth certificate; it was proven to not have been a forgery; and Hawaii even further proved this point by displaying the president's birth in a state newspaper. Like Keyser Soze would say, "...and like that, it (the conspiracy theory) was gone..."

That's not the case with Russiagate. It'd be a more accurate statement to say Russiagate is the antithesis of birtherism than to say the two are in any way similar. The FBI has gotten involved. The Senate Intelligence Committee has held hearings. A special counsel has been appointed. Trump and the rest of his inner-circle have hired lawyers. Donald Trump's personal lawyer has even hired an attorney. From the sounds of it, the investigation is just starting. So no, Mr. Hannity, Russiagate isn't like birther conspiracies. If anything, Russiagate is similar to Watergate, whereas birtherism is similar to me claiming Sean Hannity used to be a woman who went by the name Madea Spamalot. Like I said at the outset, Sean Hannity knows similes like Charlie Sheen knows sobriety.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-compares-russia-investigation-to-birther-conspiracy/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"