Skip to main content

Jeff Sessions cannot recall what he had for breakfast 5 minutes ago

Right after Attorney General Jeff Sessions exited the Oval Office following a breakfast date with President Donald Trump, I caught up with the AG and engaged in the following back and forth with him:

Excuse me, excuse me, sir! Would you mind answering a couple questions?

Sessions: "Oh golly, gee whiz, oh my. Yeah, I guess. Shucks."

So, what did you and the president discuss over breakfast this morning?

Sessions: "You know, a lil bit of this, a lil bit of that, a lil bit of the other. You know how it goes."

No, not really, which is why I asked the question. Specifically, what did the two of you discuss this morning?

Sessions: "Big, important things, I mean, like really big and really important."

Okay, one more question....

Sessions: "You said it was going to be two questions..."

Well, you didn't really answer either of my first two, so I think it's only fair to answer a third.

Sessions: "Fine. Alright then. Go ahead."

What did you and the president eat for breakfast this morning?

Sessions: "You know what? I cannot recall what we ate. I'd have to rack my brain to remember."

You just ate, what, five minutes ago?

Sessions: "Somethin' like that"

So what did you eat? Do you really expect me to believe you can't remember what you ate five minutes ago?

Sessions: "Look, the president and I ate in private and I don't feel it's appropriate to share what it is we ate."

Are you citing executive privilege here, with regard to what you ate for breakfast with the president?

Sessions: "No, of course not! Only the president can do that! But I think it's only fair to let him know about the question and ask if he wants to do the executive privilege thing before I answer."

So you're refusing to answer the question, not because of executive privilege, but the possibility of executive privilege? Wouldn't that then mean you could stay silent for the rest of Trump's tenure due to the possibility he could cite executive privilege?

Sessions: "Could you say that again? I'm not sure I understand the question. Sorry."

Did you eat eggs?

Sessions: "I cannot recall."

How about pancakes? Did you have pancakes?

Sessions: "I cannot recall."

Bacon? French toast? Lucky Charms cereal?

Sessions: "I cannot recall."

Do you like any of the foods I just listed?

Sessions: "Perhaps, maybe, gee, I don't know. I guess, maybe, sometimes, possibly."

Can you give me a straight answer about anything?

Sessions: "I might have to get back to you on that."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more