Skip to main content

No More Mr. Nice Party

For far too long the Democratic Party has tried to fight fire with tissue paper, and it's about damn time they match that fire with some fire of their own!

While liberals have often times teased Congressional Republicans for coming across as less educated than Albert Einstein's moustache, intentionally or not, these same Republicans appear to be geniuses when it comes to emotional manipulation. Let's face it, facts and numbers are boring. We need to find a way to combine those facts with more emotion in order to be more persuasive than the overly emotional and nonsensical GOPers.

Let's compare these two parties' strategies through the years:

Issue: Healthcare

Democrats (with regard to Trumpcare): "According to the Congressional Budget Office, 23 million Americans could lose healthcare."

Republicans (with regard to Obamacare): "You're all gonna die!"

Democrats (new plan of attack): "According to the CBO, 23 million of you could die!"


Issue: War

Democrats: "Let's try to go about this matter in a diplomatic means before contemplating other potential options."

Republicans: "You're either with us or you're with the terrorists! Bring it on!"

Democrats (new plan of attack): "We either talk first or thousands of our men and women in uniform will die!"


Issue: Tax Reform

Democrats: "Let's increase taxes for those at the very top of the bracket."

Republicans: "Tax cuts for everybody!"

Democrats (new plan of attack): "If you want another recession, vote Republican! If 99% of you want more money to spend, vote Dem!"


Issue: Guns

Democrats: "We should really start thinking about expanding background checks, elongating wait times, and require more training before purchasing a firearm."

Republicans: "You get a gun! You get a gun! Everyone gets a gun!"

Democrats (new plan of attack): "You're all gonna die!"


...and so on and so forth. We need to beat Republicans at their own game. We can't keep attempting to trade emotional tirades with monotone facts. Like it or not, we have to do a better job of playing into people's emotions. If we did that, the GOP wouldn't know what to do, as we'd already have them beat when it comes to thought (facts), and if we matched them when it comes to emotion, they'd have to either study up and start spouting facts, or find an alternate avenue for success. For if they have a hard time winning on their home court, they'll have a hard time winning anywhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"