Skip to main content

Ray Lewis is now the Elmer Fudd of football: "Be vewwy vewwy qwiet."

Not long ago, former Pro Bowl quarterback and human-highlight reel Michael Vick came under scrutiny for advising former Super Bowl and current free agent quarterback Colin Kaepernick to get a haircut, saying image is important. While I disagreed with the former #1 pick's assertion that Kaepernick's protests last season played no factor in him not being signed today, I could understand his unfortunately real assertion that most NFL owners are white and there's often a double-standard in the league as far as black and white players are concerned, particularly when it comes to image.

Well, now it's former Super Bowl and future Hall-of-Fame linebacker Ray Lewis's turn, and in my opinion, his advice to Kaepernick is far more troubling than Vick's. Just the other day, Lewis said this:

"The football field is our sanctuary. If you do nothing else, young man, get back on the football field and let your play speak for itself. And what you do off the field, don't let too many people know, because they're going to judge you anyway. No matter what you do, no matter if it's good or bad."

Really? Ray Lewis, a black man who has faced his share of discrimination himself, is going to tell a fellow black man that he shouldn't be so outspoken about police brutality against African-Americans in this country? Also, from a logical standpoint, Lewis's statement makes no sense. He claims that Kaepernick should keep quiet, because no matter what he says or does, people are going to judge him. If that's the case and Kaepernick is going to be judged regardless of his words or actions, why would it make sense for him to stay mum on an issue about which he feels so passionately?

Let's get one thing straight here - Colin Kaepernick didn't commit a crime. NFL players who have been charged of murder, rape, domestic violence, and dogfighting, among other things, have been given a second chance in the league. What did Kaepernick do? He protested the national anthem by taking a knee pre-game in an effort to draw attention to police brutality. Agree or disagree with his stance on the issue or his action regarding it, the man committed no crime and it's utterly ridiculous for the league to treat him as more deplorable than actual felons.

Sure, some people are sick and tired of celebrities spouting their political beliefs, but while they may have greater access to cameras and microphones than the average person, they're still Americans with Constitutional rights. Where would this country be if the oppressed quietly accepted their oppression? Where would we be if activists of the past stayed mum? Where would our black, Hispanic, Asian, Arab, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, gay, bisexual, and transgender brothers and sisters be today if we hadn't continually fought for their rights (and continue to fight today)? Like Colin Kaepernick, Ray Lewis has every right to believe and express his opinion regarding the situation, but he has to remember, without the Kaepernicks of the world, he'd have no platform from which to express those very words.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/08/01/ray-lewis-advises-colin-kaepernick-to-play-football-and-play-down-social-activism/?utm_term=.8f334d24f6b7

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"