Skip to main content

Wanting a Respectable Republican Party

This may come as a great shock to many of my readers, fans, and followers, but I want the Republican Party to return to respectability. I want the GOP to return to the Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower days. On election day, I want to choose between the better of two respectables, not the better of two evils.

The biggest reason why I spend so much time satirizing the modern-day Republican Party is because I want its members to finally realize how the GOP has been hijacked by racists, sexists, homophobes, oligarchs, narcissists, conspiracy theorists, and phony Christians, and to take it back. Unfortunately, that has yet to occur, but I still remain cautiously optimistic it will at some point.

Segueing from that, a number of self-described Republicans are, to this day, still naively stuck on the party's name, claiming it represents today what it represented 150 years ago. I'm sorry, but the party names mean relatively little. If a KKK member was a registered Democrat in 1950 and a registered Republican in 1970, one thing's for certain - the guy is a racist. The fact of the matter is the Republican Party used to be more progressive than the Democratic Party in many ways, and at that point in time, chances are I would have been a registered Republican. But that all changed with the signing of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson. The two parties began to gradually swap identities to what they are today. Yes, many 2017 Democrats would have been Republicans pre-1964 and many Republicans would have been Democrats. In other words, it's completely nonsensical for a Republican Congressperson to say in 2017, "We're the party of Lincoln!" Technically, yes, but ideologically, no, and the latter trumps the former in terms of importance to a party's identity.

In saying that, I sincerely hope the few sane, moderate Republicans left in the party find a way to take it back and, in essence, save it. Over the past two to three decades, the party has been taken over by talk radio, cable news, conspiracy-oriented websites, phony pastors, oligarchs, lobbyists, and special interest groups. As sad as it is for me to say this, a majority of the party believes science is bunk, debunked conspiracy theories are accurate, fact-checkers are fake news, and opinions and facts are interchangeable. The Democratic Party is far from perfect, but at least, for the most part, it's reasonably sane. It tends to embrace science, equality, education, and progression. I only hope the Republican Party of the future is similar in those respects, for it's almost unconscionable at times, on election day, to think to myself, "Okay, so I have to choose between a candidate who lives in the real world and accepts it and another who has no concept of reality. Okay, this is a tough call..." For as staunch of a liberal as I am, it's never a good thing to have just one sane party from which to choose, and I'll continue to poke fun of the modern-day GOP until they finally wake up, look in the mirror, realize who they've become, and do something about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"