Skip to main content

Book Preview (Part 2 of 4): "LOL at the GOP - Volume 7: Obstruction of Conscience"

In a series of posts, I will be previewing my upcoming book, LOL at the GOP - Volume 7: Obstruction of Conscience. Here is part 2 of that preview:

Introduction - Obstruction of Conscience
Close your eyes. Wait, no, keep them open, but think about them being closed. Take forty-five deep breaths and relax. Feel the calming sounds of battle scenes from Apocalypse Now in the background. Now listen to the soothing screams of Republican leaders: “Facts are fake!;” “Money is the root of all happiness!;” “Jesus died for corporations!;” “Gays must pay!;” “Guns over blood!;” “Fight for life until birth!;” “Mexicans are taco-bowl rapists!;” “You can’t spell terrorist without Muslim!;” and “God’s creation was made for pollution!”

Obstruction of conscience through hypnosis is basically how the modern-day Republican Party has brainwashed their most ardent supporters. The party has essentially become A Clockwork Orange in reverse, as instead of using hypnosis and brainwashing to help rehab an angry and violent criminal, they’ve used it to transform people from loving their neighbors to attacking them with giant dildos to the tune of “Singin’ in the Rain.” Add to that the fact the GOP has never taken the time to snap patients out of their hypnotic states, they’ve left us with a bit of an Office Space conundrum, as we’re now having to deal with 50 million Peter Gibbons’s.

So how do we snap these brainwashed Republicans out of hypnosis? I’m so glad you asked. Try talking to them in a calm manner, appear confident, make eye contact, and whenever they ask what your source is, just tell them Fox News, talk radio, or some random guy named Billy Bob Huckleberry.

If that strategy doesn’t succeed, I tend to resort to laughing, and that’s where LOL at the GOP - Volume 7: Obstruction of Conscience will come in handy. In it, you’ll read about: Rick Perry’s forgetful wisdom; Sarah Palin’s literal family feud; Señor Jeb Bush; why it’s inconceivable for many conservatives to label themselves as Constitutional; how Donald Trump would write Hallmark cards; a state senator who thinks butts and vaginas are the same thing; and so much more! So sit back, relax, and let laughter guide you in LOL at the GOP - Volume 7: Obstruction of Conscience.

While awaiting my new book, feel free to check out my other works at the following two sites:

Paperback: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/thetaoofroz

Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/Craig-Rozniecki/e/B00JBQ95LO

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"