Skip to main content

Transcript for Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 122: "Choppers Without Filters," is now available!

Podcast: I Feel Snitty

Episode 122: Choppers Without Filters

Premiere Date: 3/10/21

Length: 3:43 (588 words)

Link: https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/choppers-without-filters/

Transcript: 

Welcome to I Feel Snitty, episode 122, entitled, “Choppers Without Filters.” I’m your host, Craig Rozniecki.

 

In the past week, the Republican-led Arizona House passed a bill to provide business owners the right to deny any city or state regulations on mask-wearing at their establishments. Joseph Chaplik, the bill’s sponsor, had this to say about it:

 

“HIV was going to wipe our global destruction of human bodies with AIDS. We heard about that in the ‘80s, yet no masks were required.”

 

This may very well be the stupidest anti-mask argument I’ve heard yet. AIDS isn’t transferred via air or water, but through bodily fluids. You’ll never hear the following back-and-forth:

 

“Here, I’ll blow you a kiss.”

 

“No thanks. I don’t want AIDS.”

 

Given this rationale, I thought we could play a game. Let’s look at several different situations and conditions and apply Douche Chaplik’s if-masks-don’t-work-for-everything-they-work-for-nothing card.

 

Pregnancy (a conversation between a boyfriend and girlfriend)

Girlfriend: “I have something I need to tell you.”

 

Boyfriend: “Oh, oh. What’s up?”

 

Girlfriend: “I’m pregnant.”

 

Boyfriend: “What the hell? How could that happen?”

 

Girlfriend: “I don’t know. I just don’t know.”

 

Boyfriend: “Are you sure it’s mine?”

 

Girlfriend: “Of course it is! How dare you!”

 

Boyfriend: “Hey, hey, calm down. I just don’t know how it happened. I’ve always used protection with you.”

 

Girlfriend: “Yes, yes, I know.”

 

Boyfriend: “Magnums, every single time!”

 

Girlfriend: “That’s what you said.”

 

Boyfriend: “Oh, stop it! That shit covered up my entire face! There’s no way I could’ve gotten you pregnant!”

 

 

Gunshot to the head (a conversation from a couple of cops)

Cop #1: “Okay, so catch me up. What happened?”

 

Cop #2: “The victim walked out of this convenience store over here. Someone apparently yelled, ‘Stop or my mom will shoot!’ The victim didn’t stop. He kept inching closer and closer to the voice, until the firearm was literally touching his forehead. The shooter then fired, and that was it. Game over.”

 

Cop #1: “Did he have a seatbelt on or anything?”

 

Cop #2: “No, as you can see, sir, this happened outside of his vehicle. Face-to-face, just outside of this convenience store.”

 

Cop #1: “Well, shit, man. You know, it’s a shame.”

 

Cop #2: “What’s a shame, sir?”

 

Cop #1: “He wasn’t wearing a mask.”

 

 

Border wall (spoken by Trump)

“We’re gonna build a big, beautiful mask along our Southern border and make the cloth people pay for it. This will be the most powerful cloth known to man – with a thread-count that’s a number you don’t even know, believe me.”

 

 

Breast cancer (spoken by a modern-day Republican)

“Look, bras are basically masks for the boobs, right? So, if women wear bras, why do they still get breast cancer? Makes you think, doesn’t it?”

 

 

Joseph Chaplik

If we placed a mask over the Arizona Representative’s mouth, he’d still manage to sound stupid over social media.

 

 

So, there we have it – proof that since masks don’t work for everything, they work for nothing. Perhaps we can tell Chaplik and his ilk the same thing with regard to their manhoods and pass legislation to suggest this: If your penises don’t work for everything, they work for nothing. Yeah, I have a feeling they’d provide a starkly different reaction, and ironically enough, feel the need to protect their mini-mes with steel masks.

 

 

That’s it for today’s episode. I’ll see you again next week. Until then, you can check me out on Podbean, Twitter, Amazon, and Blogger. This has been I Feel Snitty, with Craig Rozniecki. Take care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"