Skip to main content

My hair seems to be divisive

So, I was at a pub last Friday night and a middle-aged gentleman suggested I do something about my hair. This isn't the first time such a thing has been stated to my face. Oddly enough, this same person had months ago stated that with my hair and face, that I looked like a news anchor. I guess he was just suggesting I go modern.

It seems as if my hair is a divisive beast of sorts. I've received numerous compliments about it, mainly from women, with some guys suggesting it was "too perfect" and could be one reason why I'm asked quite frequently if I'm gay. But, I've also received a number of comments saying that it's too old-fashioned and I should try and contemporize it a little bit. My mother suggests I let it grow for a while, as my hair has appeared to get wavier through the years and she's curious to see how it'd look if I grew it out a little more than has been typical. My father wants me to grow an afro. Okay, just joshing on that last one.

I'll be the first to admit my hairstyle isn't very modern necessarily, but that doesn't bother me any and there's really not much I can do about it. I have two parts in my hair. When I went to a barber last year in preparation for my brother's wedding, my brother asked that the barber experiment a bit. The barber even said, "Well, with these parts, there isn't a whole lot I can do without it appearing really unnatural." I had a buzz cut at two points in my life, one when I was a child and another when I underwent brain surgery. When I get older and perhaps start losing my hair, I may shave my head like many people do nowadays, but right now when I have a full head of hair? I can't say that option excites me any. Most men are looking to find ways to keep their hair, not get rid of it. I'd be up for a style change if I didn't have these two parts, but think it'd look quite strange to try and alter it too drastically. I don't think many people whom are critical of the style realize that. If one of the most renowned barbers in the Omaha area says there's really not much he can do, I'd say I'm kind of stuck with what I have, unless like I said, I wanted to go with the George Costanza look. No offense to ol' Georgey, but I'm in no hurry to attain that look.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...