Skip to main content

A shocking new study: Gun laws do make a difference...

A study was just released by the Violence Policy Center with regard to gun violence, and although it comes as no surprise to me, it showed that gun laws do matter. I know - shocker, right?

The study's results came courtesy of newly released data with regard to gun death rates in 2011. Overall, the gun death rate was 10.38 per 100,000, and the number of Americans killed by gunfire rose slightly from 31,672 in 2010 to 32,351 in 2011. The numbers are downright embarrassing when compared to other Western industrialized countries, such as England and Australia, which had gun death rates of 0.23 and 0.86 per 100,000, respectively.

When comparing the level of gun violence across states, the numbers showcased that higher levels of gun ownership and weaker gun laws in a state tended to equal higher gun death rates. The five states with the highest gun death rates had two things in common: 1) A high level of gun ownership, and 2) Lax gun laws.

1. Louisiana: 45.6% household gun ownership/18.91 per 100,000 gun death rate

2. Mississippi: 54.3% household gun ownership/17.80 per 100,000 gun death rate

3. Alaska: 60.6% household gun ownership/17.41 per 100,000 gun death rate

4. Wyoming: 62.8% household gun ownership/16.92 per 100,000 gun death rate

5. Montana: 61.4% household gun ownership/16.74 per 100,000 gun death rate


On the flip-side, the five states with the lowest gun death rates also had two things in common: 1) A low level of gun ownership, and 2) Strong gun laws.

50. Rhode Island: 13.3% household gun ownership/3.14 per 100,000 gun death rate

49. Hawaii: 9.7% household gun ownership/3.56 per 100,000 gun death rate

48. Massachusetts: 12.8% household gun ownership/3.84 per 100,000 gun death rate

47. New York: 18.1% household gun ownership/5.11 per 100,000 gun death rate

46. New Jersey: 11.3% household gun ownership/5.46 per 100,000 gun death rate


Average numbers

Five states with highest gun death rates: 56.9% household gun ownership/17.56 per 100,000 gun death rate

Five states with lowest gun death rates: 13.0% household gun ownership/4.22 per 100,000 gun death rate

Difference: 43.9% household gun ownership/13.34 per 100,000 gun death rate


The NRA, the Tea Party, and other such groups can try to dismiss the effectiveness of gun laws all they'd like, but the stark contrast of numbers presented in this study cannot be ignored.

As VPC (Violence Policy Center) Executive Director Josh Sugarmann said, "Gun violence is preventable, and states can pass effective laws that will dramatically reduce gun death and injury. Our analysis also shows that states with weak gun violence prevention laws and easy access to guns pay a severe price with gun death rates far above the national average."

While gun-rights activists like to shout, "Stop trying to take away our guns!" I think I speak for many when I respond with, "Obey the law and you won't have to worry about that. Stop trying to make it so easy for guns to take away people's lives!"

http://www.vpc.org/press/1406gundeath.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"