Skip to main content

When someone says, "Everything happens for a reason," they're typically not talking about causality...

I recently got into a discussion regarding the phrase, "Everything happens for a reason." While I've written about this phrase before, and how much it irks me when another utters it, it's mainly due to 95% of the people using it in reference to a higher power and predestination. When I recently discussed this with another, she referred to its accuracy due to causality (everything does literally happen for a reason, due to cause and effect). While I don't think I can dispute that claim, again, the reason why this phrase gets under my skin so much (not literally) is because, most times, it's used in reference to predestination and not in reference to causality. While the causality route may appear to be insensitive when it's used with regard to a tragedy of some kind, it's at least accurate. The predestination route, to me anyway, comes across as both insensitive and likely inaccurate. Here is an example of each:

Causality Route (rarely, if ever used)

Barbara Bushel: "I can't believe it! It's so sad! Little Billy was only 8-years-old! He had his whole life in front of him." ::breaks down and cries::

Dr. Jeremiah Singh: "Well, everything happens for a reason, my dear." ::pats her on the back::

Ms. Bushel: "What?"

Dr. Singh: "Well, you see - Billy didn't look both ways before running out into the street after his basketball. When that semi-truck hit him head on, he had less of a chance to make it than a mime does on American Idol."

Ms. Bushel: ::temporary stunned silence, before uttering...:: "What? You're such a dick!"

Dr. Singh: "They're there. Like I said - everything happens for a reason. Well, I'll leave you alone now so you can think about the fact I just laid before you. My sincere condolences..."


Predestination Route (used in most such scenarios)

Barbara Bushel: "I can't believe it! It's so sad! Little Billy was only 8-years-old! He had his whole life in front of him." ::breaks down and cries::

Dr. Jeremiah Singh: "Well, everything happens for a reason, my dear." ::pats her on the back::

Ms. Bushel: "What?"

Dr. Singh: "Well, we may not know the answer now, but we'll know some day. God has a plan for each and every one of us, and it's best for us to just place our lives in his hands and trust that he knows what to do."

Ms. Bushel: "What? Best for us? Like killing my son? You're such a dick!"

Dr. Singh: "Yes, I mean, no, I mean, I better get going. I have another appointment. Just pray, trust God, and everything will be okay. Like I said - everything happens for a reason. Well, I'll leave you alone now so you can think about the unprovable statement I just laid before you. My sincere condolences..."


So, the next time a tragedy strikes someone you know and you're tempted to utter the line, "Everything happens for a reason," give the person a big hug, and instead say, "I'm so sorry. If there's anything you ever need - if you ever need to talk or anything, I'm here for you," and mean it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"