Skip to main content

Nearly half of the population doesn't want an atheist-in-law

According to a new Pew Research Center survey, atheists are not nearly as welcome into families as are born-again Christians.

People whom took the survey were asked, "How would you feel if an immediate family member of yours was going to marry someone who does not believe in God? Happy, unhappy, or it wouldn't matter?"

While just 4% said they'd be happy, 49% said they'd be unhappy (net -45%), and 46% said it wouldn't matter. Among Christians, approximately 2.8% said they'd be happy, 61.8% said they'd be unhappy (net -59%), and 35.4% said it wouldn't matter.

When people were asked that same question, but with regard to born again Christians, here's how the numbers looked:

Overall, 32% of the respondents said they'd be happy if someone in their immediate family married a born-again Christian, 9% said they'd be unhappy (net +23%),and 57% said it wouldn't matter. Among those whom are not affiliated with any religion, approximately 9% said they'd be happy, 18.3% said they'd be unhappy (net -9.3%), and 72.7% said it wouldn't matter.

Being an agnostic, this poll shows that, if I ever get married, approximately one out of every two people in my wife's family will have a problem with me based on my lack of religious beliefs, whereas if I became a born-again Christian, only one in every ten of these in-laws would have a problem with me based on these beliefs.

For me personally, I wouldn't care who an immediate family member of mine married, as far as their religious beliefs went. Shouldn't I be more concerned with my family member's overall level of happiness while here on earth than about where his or her standing is in an after-life I can't either prove nor deny? I wouldn't even ask about the person's religious affiliation. I'd simply ask two questions: 1) Do you love him/her?, and 2) Does he/she make you happy? If the person answered in the affirmative to both, then that would be good enough for me.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/15/atheist-in-laws-survey_n_5492864.html

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/16/so-you-married-an-atheist/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...