Skip to main content

Anti-vaxxers are now anti-toothpaste

Anti-vaxxers, or the community against vaccinations, are apparently about to start fighting for another cause, as anti-vaxxer Elizabeth Insanity told the world of YouTube, or YouTubers, yesterday via a short video clip.

In the video, Ms. Insanity said this:

"I think it's safe to say that, given the measles outbreak and everything, we are winning the fight against pro-vaxxers and their evil vaccinations! Now it's time for us to further spread our wisdom! What's the one thing we all know to be more dangerous than vaccinations? Toothpaste! I read a blog one time by an author named Satire, who wrote just one sourceless sentence, but that was solid enough proof for me, as it should be for everyone! He wrote, and I quote, 'Toothpaste causes intellectual disability.' At first I was like, 'What? Who does this Satire guy really think he is?' But then I got to thinking about what he said and it just makes sense! When you're brushing your teeth or afterwards when you're still rinsing toothpaste out of your mouth, have you ever noticed that when you try talking to someone, you sound kind of stupid? That's because Mr. Satire is right; toothpaste causes intellectual disability! So I say let's go ahead with this, march forward and win the fight against toothpaste like we've done against vaccinations! Onward, my now fellow anti-toothsters!"

When I later caught up with Ms. Insanity, I asked her how she felt not brushing her teeth would affect her love life. She responded with, "Oh, I don't care; I'm asexual anyway." When I then asked her if she felt anything in particular had caused her to be asexual, she said, "Yeah, shampoo."

After being polled about this movement, it's safe to say that 5 out of 5 dentists disagree with the anti-toothsters.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"