Skip to main content

Punxsutawney Phil was wrong yet again

I really don't want to jinx the early spring-like weather we're having across the country, but based on the fact the next week and a half here in central Ohio is supposed to be in the 50s and 60s, I'd like to believe that spring is here and the groundhog was wrong yet again.

As a child, I didn't really think a great deal about holiday traditions. However, the older I get, while I love spending time with family, friends, and loved ones over the major holidays, the more I think about some of these traditions, the more I have to roll my eyes, and mumble to myself, "Wow, we've really celebrated that for all these years?"

On Christmas, we celebrate Jesus' birthday by placing a bunch of wrapped gifts under a tree and exchanging them while listening to music about a big jolly old man named Santa Claus and his reindeer, even though Jesus wasn't actually born on December 25th. On Easter, we celebrate Jesus' supposed rise from the dead by filling baskets with candy and placing colored eggs in the yard for people to find. We also have holidays where we find an excuse to gain 10 lbs. by pigging out on food all day (Thanksgiving), dress in green and drink green beer and Irish whiskey (St. Patrick's Day), and dress up in costumes and knock on doors asking for candy (Halloween). Perhaps the silliest so-called holiday of all, though, is Groundhog Day, where we all gather around and ask a groundhog to predict whether or not it will be an early spring. If he doesn't see his shadow, there will be an early spring. However, if he does see his shadow, there will be six more weeks of winter. This year, Punxsutawney Phil did see his shadow, but as usual, he appears to have been wrong, with winter ending two weeks earlier than anticipated. Excluding this early spring, the groundhog was accurate in his predictions just 39% of the time. So, yeah, if one were to just go by the opposite of Punxsutawney Phil's predictions, they'd be accurate approximately 61% of the time. Perhaps from this point forward, whatever Phil predicts, we should figure there's over a 3 in 5 chance that the opposite prediction is true.

Given the silly and ridiculous nature of Groundhog Day, might I suggest we start new holidays with the following traditions:

- In election years, a week before the actual election, we hold a nationally televised fight between an elephant and a donkey. If the elephant wins, the Republican candidate will likely win the election. However, if the donkey wins, the Democratic candidate will likely be the victor. Yes, PETA will love this one.

- Once a week, a high psychic will predict the winning lottery numbers on TMZ.

- On St. Patrick's Day every year, a drunken leprechaun tarot card reader will hold a one-hour special on ESPN where he fills out his March Madness bracket.

- On New Year's Eve, if a sloth runs the 40-yard dash in under 5 seconds, Ryan Seacrest will make out with Carson Daly and Armageddon will be upon us.

- On multiple occasions all throughout the day on a daily basis, people will draw random numbers out of a hat and give weather forecasts based on these very numbers. Actually, that might already be the case...

http://www.punxsutawney.info/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"