Skip to main content

Black men are still largely enslaved

Enslaved (verb): "cause (someone) to lose their freedom of choice or action."

Slavery may have technically ended in 1865, but I can guarantee you it still takes place today, especially when it comes to black men.

Let's look at this. When slavery was abolished, African-Americans, whom had not attained proper education, were set off into the world. It was akin to a long-time prisoner being set free. Unless strong connections are in place post-imprisonment, it's incredibly common for the prisoner to delve back into his/her old habits and wind up back in a penitentiary. So while it had to have been an indescribable feeling for slaves when slavery was abolished, once they stepped away from the only place they've ever known, it had to also have been overwhelming and stress-inducing.

Not only that, but the legal system has been biased against black men pretty much since slavery was abolished. Let's face it, it is possible for money to transcend crime. Slaves entering the real world weren't millionaires. How could they have been? If any one of them ran into legal trouble, it's not like they would get the top-of-the-line attorneys. So at the end of the day, the chances were fairly strong they'd wind up being punished by the legal system, regardless of whether or not they committed a crime. This cycle has continued to the present day. Black men are more likely to serve time for marijuana-related offenses than white men. Black men are more apt to smoking crack than snorting coke. The reverse is true of white men. Guess which offense results in a harsher prison sentence? You guessed it, crack. Due to the lack of quality legal representation for black men, prisons contain an unrepresentatively high percentage of them. The same goes for death-row inmates and executions. This isn't even taking voter-suppression laws into consideration. Especially over the past handful of election cycles, Republicans have increasingly attempted to quash black men's voting rights.

Even when a black man isn't in court or prison, he's deemed suspicious. Ever heard of DWB? That stands for Driving While Black. Why? Because if a black man is driving a car, especially if it's a nice vehicle, he's deemed suspicious. If a black man is walking around in public with his hood up, even if it's blisteringly cold outside, he's apparently up to something. If a black man is outside smoking a cigarette or talking on his phone, he could be shot by law enforcement whom mistake the item for a gun. When an unarmed black man runs away from a police officer, he could very well get shot due to being a "threat." Yes, an invisible gun would otherwise have protruded from the victim's back and shot the cop... It's gotten so bad that just recently a black man - a veteran, who had a gun permit, was mistakenly shot and killed by police at an Alabama mall after he tried to protect potential victims from an actual shooter. I thought right-wing stalwarts believed the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun was a good guy with a gun. I suppose that's only the case if the "good guy" is white.

In modern-day society, we've made it harder for black men to: Get a job; raise a family; have a career; vote; live a crime-free life; attain and maintain a driver's license; possess quality legal representation; purchase a home; etc. A black man seemingly can't drive, grocery shop, go out with friends, or even walk around outside without someone thinking he may be up to something. If he legally possesses a firearm, he probably shouldn't have one. If he's holding a cell phone, it's probably a drug-deal. If he's smoking a cigarette, it's probably laced with crack. If he's shot and killed by law enforcement officers, well, he was busted for marijuana possession that one time, so it's excusable, or he provided a perplexed expression across his face, which obviously meant he was reaching for a firearm. Even in the year 2018, many continue to be brainwashed by the notion that white is good and black is bad. When a black man enters the building, we should be on guard. If it's a white man, though, even if he's holding an AK-47, all will be well. You notice you don't hear any such stories regarding a white man? When's the last time you read a story in the paper about how a cop shot and killed an unarmed white man holding a cell phone, mistaking it for a gun? I can't remember a time either. So what are black men supposed to do? If they step outside of their homes, someone is going to think they're up to criminal activity, possibly inform the police, and who knows what could come of that as a result? In essence, they're enslaved. Legal and professional inequities, in conjunction with brainwashing, have made it next to impossible for black men, as a whole, to rise above these injustices en route to attaining full equality.

Many white people can't seem to understand these radical injustices that have been consistently enacted at the expense of our black brothers and sisters. Why? We haven't had to deal with such injustices ourselves. It's easy for us to sit back and say, "Hey, we haven't had these problems before. Why do minorities have them? Slavery is over. It's high past time they get their acts together!" We never had to deal with slavery in this country. We've never had to deal with an unfair justice system towards our race. We've never had to deal with racial profiling by our law enforcement. We've never had to worry about getting shot by police once we step outside of our homes because a cigarette was mistaken for a gun. Slavery was awful in 1850, but it's even worse in 2018. We've had how many years to try and correct the system in order to make all equal in the eyes of the law? Whites tend to like placing the brunt of the responsibility on blacks' shoulders, saying, "Slavery's been over for 150+ years. They need to move on," but the brunt of the responsibility should be placed on our own shoulders (whites), for we've allowed these enslaving injustices to continue to the present day and that trend isn't going to stop until we do something about it. As a white man, I feel it's my responsibility to fight for the equality of everyone, for if one person lacks rights, as far as I see it, none of us are free. I hope others will join me in this fight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"