Skip to main content

"Logic" brought to you by the Republican Party

It boggles my mind that at one time in the distant past Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. Granted, parties, like transportation, technology, or fashion trends, change over time. Nowhere has that been more evident than with the GOP. They've gone from the party of Lincoln to the party of voter-suppression, conspiracy theories, and the top 1%. While Republicans continually complain about immigrants not speaking fluent English in this country, the most foreign language to them appears to be logic. Let's just take three recent stories as examples.

1) Refugees

The definition of a refugee is "a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster."

In other words, a refugee is a person in harm's path, attempting to move to a safer place. I know, that sounds terrifying, right? Donald Trump and his minions have been adamantly opposed to providing such protections for refugees. Why? What's the rationale involved in making this decision? When an abused wife/mother flees her home, in hopes of finding some help, isn't she like a refugee? Yes, according to the technical definition. So if Trump were to remain consistent on his treatment of these abused women as he has been with refugees, he'd basically say, "Shoo! Don't bother us! You're on your own! Go back to your own homes!" My guess is he wouldn't say that, however, and he, along with most other Republicans would paint the matter as an apples-and-oranges argument, but in fact, that's not true. What is true would be that the GOP would hold a double-standard to those persecuted outside of this country and those persecuted within it.

2) Climate-Change

President Trump and conservative talking heads have blasted the recent climate-change report in recent days, suggesting, "Hey, it's been colder than normal these past couple days. Where's the global warming?"

This is an incredibly stupid argument on multiple fronts, the stupidest of which is there's a stark difference between weather and climate. Just because there's a week-long cold spell in a small town doesn't mean the overall temperature across the globe hasn't increased over the past 365 days. That'd be like the following scenario:

Event: LeBron James plays two consecutive below-average games.

Democrats: "He's still the best player in the world."

Republicans: "Nope, he sucks."

You see how ridiculous that sounds? Just because LeBron James has two off-games doesn't mean he's not a great player and just because we have two colder-than-average days consecutively doesn't mean climate-change isn't a thing.

3) Abortion

The Republican Party claims they're staunch pro-lifers when it comes to abortion. There's only one problem with that claim. Well, as a matter of fact, there are three problems: 1) They're anti-comprehensive sex education; 2) They're against easier access to contraception; and 3) They're not in favor of the rights of the LGBT community. Studies have shown time after time that comprehensive sex education and easy contraception access decrease unwanted pregnancies, and with that, abortions. Not only that, but who has fewer abortions than gay couples? I rest my case...

Like I said, logic is like a foreign language to the modern-day Republican Party. Hopefully their New Year's resolution is to take and pass a college-level Critical Thinking course...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"