Skip to main content

The fickle and phony media responds to Joe Paterno's passing

It really is a shame to see anyone pass along and in Joe Paterno's case, to pass on as he did. When the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal broke in November of 2011, Paterno was fired not long after the stories broke and his record-breaking numbers as the head football coach of Penn State will forever battle the before-mentioned scandal when it comes to how the sports world and world at large remembers JoPa.

It was confirmed yesterday late morning that Joe Paterno had passed away and I found it quite interesting to listen to sports writers, anchors and analysts respond to the news. Ever since the Sandusky scandal broke and Paterno was fired, many of these individuals adamantly spoke out against Paterno, saying he should have done more, that he did the bare minimum and if they had been in his shoes, they wouldn't have even hesitated to have done more to protect the children who had already been harmed and those who may have potentially suffered a similar fate. Almost all of them sang in unison that it was the right decision to fire the former Penn State coach and that his reputation would forever be tarnished due to this.

Then fast-forward to yesterday. These same individuals who spoke so illy of Paterno for 2 months leading up to his ultimate demise contradicted themselves more than Mitt Romney does in a typical day. They talked about how his reputation would forever be in tact as one of the greatest football coaches in history as well as a great man. They'd say that the Sandusky scandal would not tarnish Paterno's perception any. Some even went so far as to say he was unfairly let go by Penn State.

When I point this out to my mother, she said, "You never speak ill of the dead."

Yes, this is very understandable. A person has passed. The last thing you want to do is bash the guy/gal for mistakes they've made. So, yes, that I can fully understand. HOWEVER, don't these television stars realize they're in the spotlight? That their words can be found all across the internet and they can even see themselves on YouTube for some memorable quotes and/or predictions of theirs? I'm sure it makes JoPa feel a lot better now that he's deceased to know that those who spoke out against him for the 2 months leading up to his death are now praising him for the same things they bashed him.

I have a real problem with people who are phony. They'll put on this act for the public at large (or just a group of people, whether it be at work, school, etc.), only to hold a completely different identity when away from said group. They'll be nice to a person's face, yet criticize them behind their back. They'll act like a best friend when a person experiences a tragedy, yet will be seemingly dead to this person the rest of their lives. When people speak highly of me or even when they criticize me, I want the words to be genuine. It's not going to mean much to me if the person singing my praise to my face also speaks poorly of me behind my back. If the person consistently sings my praise, that will mean something. I'll know he or she means those very words. I'll know that they're genuine. That's all I'm saying. It's one thing to speak ill of the dead and quite another to see another as being dead with how illy you speak of them only to sing their praises upon their actually being dead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"