Skip to main content

Pre-Bowl Power 5 Conference Breakdown

ACC
Bowl eligible teams: 10 of 14 (71.4%)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 9-13 (.409)

9 wins
ACC teams: 77-33 (.700)
ACC opponents: 61-47 (.565)
Difference: +0.135
Combined score: 312-152 (average of 34.7 - 16.9 = +17.8)

13 losses
ACC teams: 72-81 (.471)
ACC opponents: 109-48 (.694)
Difference: -0.223
Combined score: 272-500 (average of 20.9 - 38.5 = -17.6)

Overall
ACC teams: 149-114 (.567)
ACC opponents: 170-95 (.642)
Difference: -0.075
Combined score: 584-652 (average of 26.5 - 29.6 = -3.1)


Big XII
Bowl eligible teams: 8 of 10 (80.0%)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 4-6 (.400)

4 wins
Big XII teams: 37-13 (.740)
Big XII opponents: 26-23 (.531)
Difference: +0.209
Combined score: 170-89 (average of 42.5 - 22.3 = +20.2)

6 losses
Big XII teams: 34-38 (.472)
Big XII opponents: 42-31 (.575)
Difference: -0.103
Combined score: 157-201 (average of  26.2 - 33.5 = -7.3)

Overall
Big XII teams: 71-51 (.582)
Big XII opponents: 68-54 (.557)
Difference: +0.025
Combined score: 327-290 (average of 32.7 - 29.0 = +3.7)


Big Ten
Bowl eligible teams: 8 of 14 (57.1%)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 7-6 (.538)

7 wins
Big Ten teams: 45-39 (.536)
Big Ten opponents: 36-47 (.433)
Difference: +0.103
Combined score: 278-147 (average of 39.7 - 21.0 = +18.7)

6 losses
Big Ten teams: 43-30 (.589)
Big Ten opponents: 52-21 (.712)
Difference: -0.123
Combined score: 128-217 (average of 21.3 - 36.2 = -14.9)

Overall
Big Ten teams: 88-69 (.561)
Big Ten opponents: 88-68 (.564)
Difference: -0.003
Combined score: 406-364 (average of 31.2 - 28.0 = +3.2)


Pac-12
Bowl eligible teams: 9 of 12 (75.0%)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 7-3 (.700)

7 wins
Pac-12 teams: 53-33 (.616)
Pac-12 opponents: 39-45 (.464)
Difference: +0.152
Combined score: 244-183 (average of 34.9 - 26.1 = +8.8)

3 losses
Pac-12 teams: 19-18 (.514)
Pac-12 opponents: 20-16 (.556)
Difference: -0.042
Combined score: 73-149 (average of 24.3 - 49.7 = -25.4)

Overall
Pac-12 teams: 72-51 (.585)
Pac-12 opponents: 59-61 (.492)
Difference: +0.093
Combined score: 317-332 (average of 31.7 - 33.2 = -2.5)


SEC
Bowl eligible teams: 10 of 14 (71.4%)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 7-9 (.438)

7 wins
SEC teams: 61-25 (.709)
SEC opponents: 43-38 (.531)
Difference: +0.178
Combined score: 208-135 (average of 29.7 - 19.3 = +10.4)

9 losses
SEC teams: 57-50 (.533)
SEC opponents: 72-37 (.727)
Difference: -0.194
Combined score: 142-298 (average of 15.8 - 33.1 = -17.3)

Overall
SEC teams: 118-75 (.611)
SEC opponents: 115-75 (.605)
Difference: +0.006
Combined score: 350-433 (average of 21.9 - 27.1 = -5.2)


Bowl eligibles
1) Big XII: 80.0%
2) Pac-12: 75.0%
3) ACC: 71.4%
3) SEC: 71.4%
5) Big Ten: 57.1%

Record vs. Power 5
1) Pac-12: .700
2) Big Ten: .538
3) SEC: .438
4) ACC: .409
5) Big XII: .400

Overall Record Differential
1) ACC: -0.075
2) Big Ten: -0.003
3) SEC: +0.006
4) Big XII: +0.025
5) Pac-12: +0.093

Combined score
1) Big XII: +3.7
2) Big Ten: +3.2
3) Pac-12: -1.5
4) ACC: -3.1
5) SEC: -5.2

Home games
1) Big XII: 30.0%
2) Big Ten: 30.8%
3) ACC: 40.9%
4) SEC: 43.8%
5) Pac-12: 60.0%

Overall
1) Big XII: 12 (out of a possible 25)
2) Big Ten: 13 (out of 25)
3) ACC: 15 (out of 25)
4) Pac-12: 16 (out of 25
5) SEC: 18 (out of 25)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...