Skip to main content

Poll shows impeaching and suing the president aren't great friends of the GOP

According to a new McClatchy-Marist poll, the Republican Party may want to hit the breaks when it comes to talking about the impeachment of President Barack Obama. According to this very poll, only 26% of the public believe that Congress should begin impeachment proceedings, while 69% do not (net -43%). Those are the exact same numbers among Independents (26% and 69%). The numbers are even more lopsided among self-described moderates, of whom only 15% believe impeachment proceedings should begin, while 79% do not (net - 64%).

If Republicans in Congress do in fact begin impeachment proceedings, this will give Democrats a 7% advantage among Independents in the coming midterm elections (39% to 32%), and a 22% advantage among moderates (49% to 27%).

When it comes to suing the president, 34% of the public believe Congress should follow through with it, while 58% do not (net -24%). The numbers are similar with regard to Independents, as 35% feel Congress should sue the president and 55% don't believe they should (net -20%). Among moderates, only 22% feel Congress should sue President Obama, while 67% do not (net -45%).

If Congress does sue the president, Independents will be more likely to vote for Democrats in November by a 36% to 34% count (net +2%) and 50% of moderates will be more likely to vote for Democratic candidates, as opposed to 25% whom will be more likely to vote for Republicans (net +25%).

If history is any indicator, the Republican Party has a good chance to pick up seats in Congress this coming November. However, they could be their own worst enemy when it comes to actually accomplishing that very goal. Sure, talk about impeaching and suing the president may play well among die-hard conservatives, but it's not so popular with the rest of the country and if the GOP keeps up this rhetoric and people actually come out to vote in November, they could be in for quite the surprise.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/13/the-gop-needs-impeachment-to-go-away-along-with-its-lawsuit-against-obama/

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/misc/usapolls/us140804/Obama_Congress/Complete%20McClatchy-Marist%20Poll%20National%20Nature%20of%20the%20Sample%20and%20Tables_Obama%20and%20Congress_August%202014.pdf#page=23

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"