Tennessee is just the latest state to receive a failing grade for their drug-testing of welfare applicants
Given the failed results so far, it's a wonder why states are continually pushing forth bills to require welfare applicants to pass drug tests in order to be eligible for such benefits.
The state of Utah spent over $30,000 on these drug tests, and what did these tests reveal? Just 12 drug users. That was money well spent.
In Florida, just 2% of welfare applicants tested positive for drugs in 2011, whereas approximately 8% of the state uses illegal drugs. This resulted in a net loss of money for the state.
Virginia lawmakers rejected a proposed drug-testing program for welfare applicants because, while it would save an estimated $229,000, it would also cost $1.5 million. In other words, it wouldn't save any money at all.
That brings us to Tennessee. The state started their drug-testing program in July. What have the results been to this point? Oh, let's see here - of 812 applicants, 1 has tested positive. In other words, 0.12% of applicants tested positive for drugs.
Let me paint a clearer picture of how just minuscule that is:
- California is the most populous state in the country, home to approximately 38,332,521 people. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, we'd wind up with 459,990, which would make it the least populous state in the country, close to 100,000 behind Wyoming.
- China's population is around 1.26 billion. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, China's population would be around 15,120,000, which would place it at number 65, in between Malawi and Mali.
- Earth spreads across 3,959 miles. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, Earth would spread across just 47.5 miles - the same distance between the cities of Omaha, Nebraska and Lincoln, Nebraska.
In light of all these numbers, perhaps, instead of drug-testing welfare applicants, we should require politicians to take IQ tests before being permitted into office...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/08/07/3468610/tennessee-welfare-drug-test-positive/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=0
http://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/populations/ctypopls.htm
http://www.distance-cities.com/distance-omaha-ne-to-lincoln-ne
The state of Utah spent over $30,000 on these drug tests, and what did these tests reveal? Just 12 drug users. That was money well spent.
In Florida, just 2% of welfare applicants tested positive for drugs in 2011, whereas approximately 8% of the state uses illegal drugs. This resulted in a net loss of money for the state.
Virginia lawmakers rejected a proposed drug-testing program for welfare applicants because, while it would save an estimated $229,000, it would also cost $1.5 million. In other words, it wouldn't save any money at all.
That brings us to Tennessee. The state started their drug-testing program in July. What have the results been to this point? Oh, let's see here - of 812 applicants, 1 has tested positive. In other words, 0.12% of applicants tested positive for drugs.
Let me paint a clearer picture of how just minuscule that is:
- California is the most populous state in the country, home to approximately 38,332,521 people. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, we'd wind up with 459,990, which would make it the least populous state in the country, close to 100,000 behind Wyoming.
- China's population is around 1.26 billion. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, China's population would be around 15,120,000, which would place it at number 65, in between Malawi and Mali.
- Earth spreads across 3,959 miles. If we were to calculate 0.12% of that number, Earth would spread across just 47.5 miles - the same distance between the cities of Omaha, Nebraska and Lincoln, Nebraska.
In light of all these numbers, perhaps, instead of drug-testing welfare applicants, we should require politicians to take IQ tests before being permitted into office...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/08/07/3468610/tennessee-welfare-drug-test-positive/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=0
http://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/populations/ctypopls.htm
http://www.distance-cities.com/distance-omaha-ne-to-lincoln-ne
Comments
Post a Comment