Skip to main content

Let's cut right to the chase. There's no such thing as "alternative facts."

On January 22nd's episode of Meet the Press, Donald Trump senior advisor Kellyanne Conway defended Trump press secretary Sean Spicer's debunked claim that Donald Trump's inauguration crowd was larger than it actually was by telling host Chuck Todd, "You're saying it's falsehoods. And they're giving - Sean Spicer, our press secretary - gave alternative facts."

I'm sorry, but there's no such thing as alternative facts. "Alternative fact" is synonymous with falsehood, lie, bullsh*t, malarkey, etc. When a comment runs contrary to a well-established fact, that comment isn't a fact in any sense of the word; it's simply false. Just imagine if we used Ms. Conway's line of thinking throughout the course of our lives...

Setting: Math class

Professor Ymidoingthis: "Can anyone tell me what 7 x 7 is?"

Ronald Rump: "14"

Ymidoingthis: "I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. The answer is 49."

Rump: "I was just giving you an alternative fact, teach."

Ymidoingthis: "No, for you can't spell 'math' without 'fact'."

Rump: "That's not right."

Ymidoingthis: "Exactly. It's an alternative fact, which means it's wrong."


Setting: A couple's honeymoon

Shawn Spiker: "Oh, Kelly! Oh, Kelly! Yes! Yes! Yes!"

Carrie Spiker: "Hey! What in the hell do you think you're doing?!? On our honeymoon? Seriously? I thought you said you'd never sleep with her!"

Shawn: "It's not what it looks like! I was just giving you an alternative fact, honey. You understand, right?!?"

Carrie: "Right, and I'll give you an alternative fact - I'm not going to be taking anything of yours when I divorce your ass!"


Setting: The Oval Office

Donald Trump: "Let's see, what should my alternative facts be of the day? So many options, like big league. Obama was born in Kenya, the earth is flat, Jesus was born in Iowa, socialism means to believe in talking a lot, I won the popular vote, voter fraud is like a thing, Melania married me for my awesome modesty, oh, and my penis is yuge!"

http://ew.com/books/2017/01/27/1984-sells-out-alternative-facts/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"