Skip to main content

Movie recommendation: "What's In a Name?"

For whatever reason, I've been on a foreign film kick of late, and thought I'd recommend yet another to my readers. It's a French film by the name of What's In a Name?, where a dinner party goes from calm and friendly to angry and chaotic over a guest's idea for a baby name - Adolphe. This guest and one of the host's then heatedly debate on whether or not any child should be subjected to such a name due to Adolf Hitler. This dramedy's dialogue takes several twists and turns through it's nearly two hours, often sharp and funny, yet this exchange is at the core of what the film's about, and it got me to thinking (yes, scary thought, I know). I hate to play off the film's title, but seriously, "What's In a Name?"

Now, would I ever name or think about naming my child Adolf/Adolphe? No. But why is that? Have I been programmed to believe all things affiliated with that name are evil because of one man, and is this right/fair? What about Ben(ito Mussolini)? Joseph (Stalin)? Saddam (Hussein)? Osama (bin Laden)? Sure, Saddam and Osama are highly unusual names in my country, but Ben and Joe are quite common, so why must the name Adolf be off limits, but not Ben or Joe? Then, while it may not hold equal weight among citizens at large, is it also not common to reject a person based on their name and a taste-aversion to that name due to a negative experience from one's past? When a couple is deciding on their coming baby's name, I'll often hear the following conversation (or something like it):

Husband: "How about Tony?"

Wife: "No! I had this really bad date one time with a guy by the name of Tony. It was a blind date and his first line to me was, 'Nice dress. I bet you $50 I'll see you out of it by the end of this date.'"

Husband: "Wow, really?!? So did he?"

Wife: "Did he what?"

Husband: "See you out of your dress by the end of the date?"

Wife: "God, no! What kind of person do you think I am?"

Husband: "Okay, sorry, sorry. Do you have any ideas?"

Wife: "What about Jeff?"

Husband: "No way!"

Wife: "Why not?"

Husband: "I once knew a guy who had a crazy uncle named Jeff. I met him once and had to see a shrink for a couple years after that."

Wife: "What happened?"

Husband: "I don't wanna talk about it. How about the name Ronald?"

Wife: "Like creepy Ronald McDonald? No! What about George?"

Husband: "You mean, like the Bush's? Should we call him Dubya?"

Wife: "Ugh! We're never going to find a name we both like!"

Husband: "I know! So, nice dress. I bet you $50 I'll see you out of it by the end of the date."

Wife: "Yeah, dream on, buddy. I'm going to head out and drink with my buddy, Jeff."


All kidding aside, though, I find it quite fascinating how much power we often give to names, the negative connotations we may see in some of them, and how they may influence our future decisions. If you like thoughtful dialogue, dry humor, and foreign cinema, I'd definitely check out What's In a Name? If curious, you can find more information about it here:

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/whats_in_a_name_2013/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"