Skip to main content

Offering to remove the stick from Ellen bashers' rears...

The intentions behind political correctness are good, and in my opinion, the benefits outweigh the hindrances. In saying that, however, there are times the PC-police go too far, and at no time is that more evident than in a recent event surrounding Ellen Degeneres.

Actress, comedian, and talk show host, Ellen DeGeneres, recently posted a happy birthday tweet to her friend Katy Perry's page.

The tweet read, "Happy birthday, #KatyPerry! It's time to bring out the big balloons!" Attached to the post was a picture of Ellen making a goofy face while staring at Ms. Perry's chest. Perry appeared to be laughing in the photo.

To my surprise, there were a number of complaints made regarding Ellen's tweet.

Piers Morgan responded, "If a man made this joke, Ellen would lead the cries of 'SEXIST PIG!'"

Michael Rapaport echoed those sentiments, as he tweeted, "Imagine if Cam Newton or any other Man sent out this tweet & photo."

A tweeter with the username Pundit Class posted a tweet which continued the earlier set trend, as he said, "If a man did this, there would be hell to pay."

Lasly, a member with the username Mike Meins wrote, "I'm creeped out over this. @TheEllenShow is disgusting. She belongs in the same bull pen as #Weinstein."

I'm sorry, but give me a fricking break. Ellen is a comedian, a friend of Katy Perry's, and was both referring to a song of Ms. Perry's and an earlier photograph the two took with one another where they appeared to be having a blast. Three of the four before-mentioned tweeters wanted to claim that there was a double-standard at work here. I'm sorry, but in order to make this an apples-to-apples comparison, we can't just say, "Any man who posted such a tweet would be labeled as a sexist." This man would have to be friends with Katy Perry and include a photo of him making a goofy face while staring at Ms. Perry's chest, and her appearing to get a kick out of it. Sure, it would likely be seen as even more controversial than Ellen's post, but we have to look at the surrounding context and not just generalize.

Also, at what point in the post is Ellen being sexist? At what point is she discriminating against Katy Perry, and with that, women everywhere? She's not saying a woman with larger than average breasts is superior or inferior, or that what makes a woman are her breasts. She's simply making an observation. Since when is making such an observation prejudice? Acknowledging that a person is naturally tan in complexion isn't racist. Claiming this person is inferior due to that complexion is. Similarly, Ellen acknowledging that Katy Perry may have a larger chest than herself is not sexist. If she had said something like, "That's all women are good for - to look at and have sex with," that would be sexist, and isn't at all similar to what Ms. DeGeneres actually said.

Lastly, the fourth tweeter's comparison is ridiculous to the point of insane. Ellen DeGeneres cracked a joke with a personal friend of her's. Even if Ellen's tweet was the most offensive joke in the history of mankind, the pain and damage it would inflict would pale in comparison to Harvey Weinstein's past misdeeds. Ellen DeGeneres making a joke about a personal friend's chest size isn't anywhere close to Harvey Weinstein groping women's chests without their consent, harassing, assaulting, and raping them. A joke may be hit or miss when it comes to how much laughter it prompts. There's absolutely nothing funny about rape, and to compare the two is an insult to victims everywhere.

http://www.nme.com/news/ellen-degeneres-branded-sexist-over-katy-perry-happy-birthday-message-2153797

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"