Skip to main content

Don Jr. gets an "A" in riding coattails, an "F" in math

Donald Trump, Jr. took to Twitter to defend his father's record on minorities, as he posted this tweet:

"If over his entire presidency Obama had accomplished 10% of what @realDonaldTrump for these groups the left would anoint him emperor for life. When Trump does it in less than 2 years it's Blah Blah Blah. What a joke!"

I think it's safe to assume Don Jr. is speaking in reference to the fact that unemployment among African-Americans is at the lowest rate ever recorded, dipping to under 6%. But as usual, a Trump isn't telling the whole story and is largely taking credit for someone else's work.

Like every other demographic, black unemployment rose during the Great Recession, peaking at above 15% in 2010. It's been going down ever since, dipping to 12.5% in 2013, 10% in 2015, and roughly 7.5% when Obama left office. So black unemployment went from 17.5% to 7.5% under President Obama, a decrease of 57%. Meanwhile, it's decreased from 7.5% to 6% under President Trump, a decrease of 20% or 37% less than what was achieved under Obama. If Obama had accomplished 10% of what Donald Trump has with regard to African-American unemployment, the unemployment rate would have dropped from 17.5% to 17.3%. Crazily enough, it dropped to 7.5%.

This tactic is very commonplace for the Trumps. Unemployment numbers have been trending downward since the economy started recovering under President Obama. Stock numbers have been trending upward. Job-creation numbers have gone from -800,000 per month to +150,000 to +350,000 per month. Donald Trump can take credit all he likes, the economy didn't just magically turnaround with the snap of his fingers when he was sworn in on January 20th of 2017. These positive economical trends started under President Obama and have been continuing ever since. Therefore he should get the bulk of the credit. When an NFL team has a long successful run and then has to hire a new coach for whatever reason, this new coach isn't all of a sudden the reason for the team's past successes. Chances are he'll have an easier time attaining success, at least in the short-term, than other coaches around the league, but this in no way means it's due to his scouting, work ethic, and/or philosophy that the team is successful in the span. We're not going to know how successful or unsuccessful his coaching is until multiple years have passed. The same holds true for Donald Trump, and the fact of the matter is, from what I've seen thus far anyway, if Trump achieves 10% of what Obama achieved on any front, it'll come as quite the surprise. 

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-says-obama-would-have-been-made-emperor-life-if-hed-done-10-1331186

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/lns14000006

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"