Skip to main content

Well, that sucked...

That was, without a doubt, the worst Super Bowl experience I've ever endured. From the unfunny commercials to the lousy game to the forgettable halftime show, the three best moments of the night were: 1) The John Malkovich pre-game shtick; 2) Gladys Knight's rendition of the National Anthem; and 3) The NFL 100 commercial. That's right, none of those grand moments actually occurred on the field during the game.

Let's start with the game. Super Bowl LIII set the following records:

- Fewest Combined Points: 16

- Fewest Points By Winning Team: 13

- Fewest Combined Points Through 3 Quarters: 6

- Fewest Combined Touchdowns: 1

- Fewest Combined Extra Points: 1

- Fewest Combined Kickoff Returns: 2

- Most Consecutive Drives Ending In A Punt: 8 (LA Rams)

- Fewest Points By A Team (tied): 3 (LA Rams)

- Fewest Touchdowns By A Team (tied): 0 (LA Rams)

- Fewest Combined Passing Touchdowns (tied): 0

There were about as many punts as points scored in last night's game. Things were so bad that Jim Nantz got excited after the Rams kicked a record-breaking 65-yard punt in the 3rd quarter. Sadly, that remained one of the high points for the Rams through the rest of the game. There wasn't a red-zone possession until midway in the 4th quarter. Kickers outscored skill-position players 10-6. The high-flying Rams offense were held to well under 300 yards of total offense, and even that number is misleading, for they gained 70+ in garbage time. There's a stark difference between a true defensive slugfest and a rotten game. Unfortunately, Super Bowl LIII was the latter. Sure, the Rams' defense played well enough to win, but they did it in a bend-but-don't-break kind of way and Golden Boy Tom Brady wasn't at his most efficient. The Patriots defense came to play, but that had as much to do with the Rams' bad play-calling and lack of adjustments as it did with their great play. Place all of those components and what do you have? A snoozer, "bigly," as Trump might say.

Not all of the commercials were bad, but I think I chuckled less than a handful of times throughout the course of the night. What happened to funny commercials? Instead we got: A creepy robot from TurboTax; car commercials which don't feature a single car until the final second, leaving people wondering until that point what in the hell the creators were selling; Jeff Bridges and Sarah Jessica Parker just basically saying, "Oh, you drink that? Me too. Sweet;" Pepsi branding itself as "more than okay;" a hybrid of "dilly dilly" and Game of Thrones (is there going to be an upcoming episode entitled, "Dilly Dilly" or something?); T-Mobile text messages; Andy Warhol eating a Whopper; etc. To me, while there were some mediocre commercials, the two lone standouts were the Washington Post Tom Hanks-narrated ad and the previously-mentioned NFL 100 commercial. If it was advertisers' New Year's resolution to break the Guinness Book of World Record for awkward robot appearances in Super Bowl ads, I think they can proudly say, "Mission accomplished!"

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the halftime show. Maroon 5, Travis Scott, and Big Boi put on a, uh, show? Maroon 5 singer Adam Levine sounded offkey throughout much of the band's performance. Then, for whatever reason, a pair of rappers decided to join the party and make Levine look awkward in the process. I'll never be able to forget his sad attempt at dance moves... Once Travis Scott and Big Boi exited the stage, Levine, perhaps knowing things weren't going very well, decided to remove his shirt and strut his stuff. So that was special. If looking at Adam Levine's tattoos and nipples are your thing, perhaps you could have pressed "mute" and enjoyed the show. Otherwise, it was nothing to write home about.

Punts galore. Creepy robots. Adam Levine's nipples. Yeah, this was one Super Bowl Sunday I'd like to soon forget...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"