Skip to main content

Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 219: ”'Withholding the Bribery' (parody based off Green Day’s song 'Before the Lobotomy')" is now available!

The latest episode of my podcast ("I Feel Snitty"), entitled ”'Withholding the Bribery' (parody based off Green Day’s song 'Before the Lobotomy')" is now available!

Here are the lyrics:

“Withholding the Bribery”

Speaking, he was only speaking

“I’ll give you that if you give me this,” no quid pro quo

Dealing, he is always dealing

“Four-hundred million for Biden’s dental records”

Reeling, his story is reeling

Like the Pinocchio-who-cried-wolf on steroids

Covers, he’s running for covers

But the bed he made he will now have to lie in

 

(Oh, boo-hoo)

He’s withholding the bribery

One even the blind can see

Guilty of fraud and conspiracy

Obstruction and being a pu$$y

 

He never thought he would be caught

He thought everything could be bought

Forgot technology exists

Thought TikTok was a clock for kids

 

Impeached for his crimes on two counts (Lock!)

Then acquitted by soul sell-outs (Him!)

He must have some dirt on them (Up!)

Lady G’s blow-up doll named Gym

 

Morals not a part of his life

He’d rather die than say he lied

About to face his comeuppance

“Mother’s disappointed,” says Mike Pence

 

A criminal (Lock)

He is a criminal (Him)

A criminal (Up)

He is a criminal (Now)

Each accusation is a confession

When he threatens, he says “I was…”

 

Speaking, he was only speaking

“I’ll give you that if you give me this,” no quid pro quo

Dealing, he is always dealing

“Four-hundred million for Biden’s dental records”

Reeling, his story is reeling

Like the Pinocchio-who-cried-wolf on steroids

Covers, he’s running for covers

But the bed he made he will now have to lie in

 

The song can be found here. -  https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/withholding-the-bribery-parody-based-off-green-day-s-song-before-the-lobotomy/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"