Skip to main content

All in favor of a voting holiday, say, "Aye!" Aye!

This happens once every four years in the U.S. Why must we have it on a Tuesday first of all and why if it's going to be on a Tuesday, why isn't it a national holiday?

I don't care about the "tradition" of voting on Tuesday. I'm sorry to say, but some traditions are stupid. Why is there low-voting turnout in this country? Sure, some people may not have any interest in it and/or feel there's really no use in voting. However, I'd like to believe the main reason is the day is too hectic for some. Between a person working a job or two (perhaps going to class), taking care of kids, errands and everything else that transpires through the course of their day, it may be next to impossible for them to make it to the voting booth. Why should their voices be punished due to all the work they put forth throughout the course of their day?

So what would it hurt if we added a national holiday once every four years? I'm not asking for much - just one holiday (one day off) every 1,461 days. We have off every July 4th to blow up fireworks and celebrate our independence. What illustrates our independence any more than partaking in our "democracy" and voting? I can all but guarantee that voter turnout would increase substantially if people got the day off to make their voices heard at the voting booths.

Our political system is becoming a bigger and bigger joke, to people both foreign and domestic. I think it'd be tremendously beneficial for us to alter our voting tradition - either spreading it out over a full weekend (or just one day over the weekend) and/or making it a national holiday. More people would go out and vote, more kids would get educated about politics and the voting process, and this country would feel more like a democracy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"